Non-medical factors in prehospital resuscitation decision-making: a mixed-methods systematic review

Louise Milling*, Jeannett Kjær, Lars Grassmé Binderup, Caroline Schaffalitzky de Muckadell, Ulrik Havshøj, Helle Collatz Christensen, Erika Frischknecht Christensen, Annmarie Touborg Lassen, Søren Mikkelsen, Dorthe Nielsen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)
54 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

AIM: This systematic review explored how non-medical factors influence the prehospital resuscitation providers' decisions whether or not to resuscitate adult patients with cardiac arrest.

METHODS: We conducted a mixed-methods systematic review with a narrative synthesis and searched for original quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods studies on non-medical factors influencing resuscitation of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Mixed-method reviews combine qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-method studies to answer complex multidisciplinary questions. Our inclusion criteria were peer-reviewed empirical-based studies concerning decision-making in prehospital resuscitation of adults > 18 years combined with non-medical factors. We excluded commentaries, case reports, editorials, and systematic reviews. After screening and full-text review, we undertook a sequential exploratory synthesis of the included studies, where qualitative data were synthesised first followed by a synthesis of the quantitative findings.

RESULTS: We screened 15,693 studies, reviewed 163 full-text studies, and included 27 papers (12 qualitative, two mixed-method, and 13 quantitative papers). We identified five main themes and 13 subthemes related to decision-making in prehospital resuscitation. Especially the patient's characteristics and the ethical aspects were included in decisions concerning resuscitation. The wishes and emotions of bystanders further influenced the decision-making. The prehospital resuscitation providers' characteristics, experiences, emotions, values, and team interactions affected decision-making, as did external factors such as the emergency medical service system and the work environment, the legislation, and the cardiac arrest setting. Lastly, prehospital resuscitation providers' had to navigate conflicts between jurisdiction and guidelines, and conflicting values and interests.

CONCLUSIONS: Our findings underline the complexity in prehospital resuscitation decision-making and highlight the need for further research on non-medical factors in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Original languageEnglish
Article number24
JournalScandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
Volume30
Issue number1
ISSN1757-7241
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 28 Mar 2022

Bibliographical note

© 2022. The Author(s).

Keywords

  • Adult
  • Emergency Medical Services
  • Humans
  • Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/therapy
  • Resuscitation Orders

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Non-medical factors in prehospital resuscitation decision-making: a mixed-methods systematic review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this