Operating room nurses' positioning of anesthetized surgical patients

Erik Elgaard Sørensen, Kathrine Hoffmann Kusk, Mette Grønkjaer

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To describe the incidence of problems associated with the positioning of anaesthetised surgical patients.

BACKGROUND: The positioning of the anaesthetised surgical patient is a complex task. The interdisciplinary nature with several professional groups in a surgical team may lead to conflict between the positioning standards and individual consideration for the patient. Existing knowledge of the relationship between the different positioning forms, surgical team competences and the applicability and availability of positioning equipment is sparse.

DESIGN: A descriptive cross-sectional study.

METHOD: An electronic questionnaire was sent to 833 OR nurses employed at four public university hospitals. With 481 responses, a response rate of 57·7% was achieved. Descriptive statistical analyses were performed using the spss software package (version 19.00).

RESULTS: Positioning of the patient was found to be particularly difficult for the prone (43·8%), lithotomy (53·4%) and lateral (65·5%) positions. Lack of positioning competences and equipment for arm support, standardised equipment for leg support and standard sizes of OR beds seemed to complicate positioning.

CONCLUSION: Lack of appropriate positioning equipment and positioning competences in surgical teams, combined with the poor availability of positioning equipment in ORs were found to cause problems.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: There is a need for innovative solutions to develop modern forms of positioning equipment allowing individual consideration of the patient. Further research is required on positioning equipment, optimisation of continuity and the establishment of permanent surgical teams.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Clinical Nursing
Volume25
Issue number5-6
Pages (from-to)690-698
Number of pages9
ISSN0962-1067
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Operating Rooms
Nurses
Equipment and Supplies
Mental Competency
Hospital Bed Capacity
Patient Positioning
Public Hospitals
Leg
Arm
Software
Cross-Sectional Studies
Incidence
Research

Cite this

@article{525dc0ad42a64421a183fbd16d617478,
title = "Operating room nurses' positioning of anesthetized surgical patients",
abstract = "AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To describe the incidence of problems associated with the positioning of anaesthetised surgical patients.BACKGROUND: The positioning of the anaesthetised surgical patient is a complex task. The interdisciplinary nature with several professional groups in a surgical team may lead to conflict between the positioning standards and individual consideration for the patient. Existing knowledge of the relationship between the different positioning forms, surgical team competences and the applicability and availability of positioning equipment is sparse.DESIGN: A descriptive cross-sectional study.METHOD: An electronic questionnaire was sent to 833 OR nurses employed at four public university hospitals. With 481 responses, a response rate of 57·7{\%} was achieved. Descriptive statistical analyses were performed using the spss software package (version 19.00).RESULTS: Positioning of the patient was found to be particularly difficult for the prone (43·8{\%}), lithotomy (53·4{\%}) and lateral (65·5{\%}) positions. Lack of positioning competences and equipment for arm support, standardised equipment for leg support and standard sizes of OR beds seemed to complicate positioning.CONCLUSION: Lack of appropriate positioning equipment and positioning competences in surgical teams, combined with the poor availability of positioning equipment in ORs were found to cause problems.RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: There is a need for innovative solutions to develop modern forms of positioning equipment allowing individual consideration of the patient. Further research is required on positioning equipment, optimisation of continuity and the establishment of permanent surgical teams.",
author = "S{\o}rensen, {Erik Elgaard} and Kusk, {Kathrine Hoffmann} and Mette Gr{\o}nkjaer",
note = "{\circledC} 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1111/jocn.13000",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "690--698",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Nursing",
issn = "0962-1067",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "5-6",

}

Operating room nurses' positioning of anesthetized surgical patients. / Sørensen, Erik Elgaard; Kusk, Kathrine Hoffmann; Grønkjaer, Mette.

In: Journal of Clinical Nursing, Vol. 25, No. 5-6, 2016, p. 690-698.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Operating room nurses' positioning of anesthetized surgical patients

AU - Sørensen, Erik Elgaard

AU - Kusk, Kathrine Hoffmann

AU - Grønkjaer, Mette

N1 - © 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To describe the incidence of problems associated with the positioning of anaesthetised surgical patients.BACKGROUND: The positioning of the anaesthetised surgical patient is a complex task. The interdisciplinary nature with several professional groups in a surgical team may lead to conflict between the positioning standards and individual consideration for the patient. Existing knowledge of the relationship between the different positioning forms, surgical team competences and the applicability and availability of positioning equipment is sparse.DESIGN: A descriptive cross-sectional study.METHOD: An electronic questionnaire was sent to 833 OR nurses employed at four public university hospitals. With 481 responses, a response rate of 57·7% was achieved. Descriptive statistical analyses were performed using the spss software package (version 19.00).RESULTS: Positioning of the patient was found to be particularly difficult for the prone (43·8%), lithotomy (53·4%) and lateral (65·5%) positions. Lack of positioning competences and equipment for arm support, standardised equipment for leg support and standard sizes of OR beds seemed to complicate positioning.CONCLUSION: Lack of appropriate positioning equipment and positioning competences in surgical teams, combined with the poor availability of positioning equipment in ORs were found to cause problems.RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: There is a need for innovative solutions to develop modern forms of positioning equipment allowing individual consideration of the patient. Further research is required on positioning equipment, optimisation of continuity and the establishment of permanent surgical teams.

AB - AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To describe the incidence of problems associated with the positioning of anaesthetised surgical patients.BACKGROUND: The positioning of the anaesthetised surgical patient is a complex task. The interdisciplinary nature with several professional groups in a surgical team may lead to conflict between the positioning standards and individual consideration for the patient. Existing knowledge of the relationship between the different positioning forms, surgical team competences and the applicability and availability of positioning equipment is sparse.DESIGN: A descriptive cross-sectional study.METHOD: An electronic questionnaire was sent to 833 OR nurses employed at four public university hospitals. With 481 responses, a response rate of 57·7% was achieved. Descriptive statistical analyses were performed using the spss software package (version 19.00).RESULTS: Positioning of the patient was found to be particularly difficult for the prone (43·8%), lithotomy (53·4%) and lateral (65·5%) positions. Lack of positioning competences and equipment for arm support, standardised equipment for leg support and standard sizes of OR beds seemed to complicate positioning.CONCLUSION: Lack of appropriate positioning equipment and positioning competences in surgical teams, combined with the poor availability of positioning equipment in ORs were found to cause problems.RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: There is a need for innovative solutions to develop modern forms of positioning equipment allowing individual consideration of the patient. Further research is required on positioning equipment, optimisation of continuity and the establishment of permanent surgical teams.

U2 - 10.1111/jocn.13000

DO - 10.1111/jocn.13000

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 26493686

VL - 25

SP - 690

EP - 698

JO - Journal of Clinical Nursing

JF - Journal of Clinical Nursing

SN - 0962-1067

IS - 5-6

ER -