TY - JOUR
T1 - Parity, breastfeeding and risk of coronary heart disease
T2 - A pan-European case-cohort study
AU - Peters, Sanne Ae
AU - van der Schouw, Yvonne T
AU - Wood, Angela M
AU - Sweeting, Michael J
AU - Moons, Karel Gm
AU - Weiderpass, Elisabete
AU - Arriola, Larraitz
AU - Benetou, Vassiliki
AU - Boeing, Heiner
AU - Bonnet, Fabrice
AU - Butt, Salma T
AU - Clavel-Chapelon, Françoise
AU - Drake, Isabel
AU - Gavrila, Diana
AU - Key, Timothy J
AU - Klinaki, Eleni
AU - Krogh, Vittorio
AU - Kühn, Tilman
AU - Lassale, Camille
AU - Masala, Giovanna
AU - Matullo, Giuseppe
AU - Merritt, Melissa
AU - Molina-Portillo, Elena
AU - Moreno-Iribas, Conchi
AU - Nøst, Therese H
AU - Olsen, Anja
AU - Onland-Moret, N Charlotte
AU - Overvad, Kim
AU - Panico, Salvatore
AU - Redondo, M Luisa
AU - Tjønneland, Anne
AU - Trichopoulou, Antonia
AU - Tumino, Rosario
AU - Turzanski-Fortner, Renée
AU - Tzoulaki, Ioanna
AU - Wennberg, Patrik
AU - Winkvist, Anna
AU - Thompson, Simon G
AU - Di Angelantonio, Emanuele
AU - Riboli, Elio
AU - Wareham, Nicholas J
AU - Danesh, John
AU - Butterworth, Adam S
N1 - © The European Society of Cardiology 2016.
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - OBJECTIVE: There is uncertainty about the direction and magnitude of the associations between parity, breastfeeding and the risk of coronary heart disease (CHD). We examined the separate and combined associations of parity and breastfeeding practices with the incidence of CHD later in life among women in a large, pan-European cohort study.METHODS: Data were used from European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC)-CVD, a case-cohort study nested within the EPIC prospective study of 520,000 participants from 10 countries. Information on reproductive history was available for 14,917 women, including 5138 incident cases of CHD. Using Prentice-weighted Cox regression separately for each country followed by a random-effects meta-analysis, we calculated hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for CHD, after adjustment for age, study centre and several socioeconomic and biological risk factors.RESULTS: Compared with nulliparous women, the adjusted HR was 1.19 (95% CI: 1.01-1.41) among parous women; HRs were higher among women with more children (e.g., adjusted HR: 1.95 (95% CI: 1.19-3.20) for women with five or more children). Compared with women who did not breastfeed, the adjusted HR was 0.71 (95% CI: 0.52-0.98) among women who breastfed. For childbearing women who never breastfed, the adjusted HR was 1.58 (95% CI: 1.09-2.30) compared with nulliparous women, whereas for childbearing women who breastfed, the adjusted HR was 1.19 (95% CI: 0.99-1.43).CONCLUSION: Having more children was associated with a higher risk of CHD later in life, whereas breastfeeding was associated with a lower CHD risk. Women who both had children and breastfed did have a non-significantly higher risk of CHD.
AB - OBJECTIVE: There is uncertainty about the direction and magnitude of the associations between parity, breastfeeding and the risk of coronary heart disease (CHD). We examined the separate and combined associations of parity and breastfeeding practices with the incidence of CHD later in life among women in a large, pan-European cohort study.METHODS: Data were used from European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC)-CVD, a case-cohort study nested within the EPIC prospective study of 520,000 participants from 10 countries. Information on reproductive history was available for 14,917 women, including 5138 incident cases of CHD. Using Prentice-weighted Cox regression separately for each country followed by a random-effects meta-analysis, we calculated hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for CHD, after adjustment for age, study centre and several socioeconomic and biological risk factors.RESULTS: Compared with nulliparous women, the adjusted HR was 1.19 (95% CI: 1.01-1.41) among parous women; HRs were higher among women with more children (e.g., adjusted HR: 1.95 (95% CI: 1.19-3.20) for women with five or more children). Compared with women who did not breastfeed, the adjusted HR was 0.71 (95% CI: 0.52-0.98) among women who breastfed. For childbearing women who never breastfed, the adjusted HR was 1.58 (95% CI: 1.09-2.30) compared with nulliparous women, whereas for childbearing women who breastfed, the adjusted HR was 1.19 (95% CI: 0.99-1.43).CONCLUSION: Having more children was associated with a higher risk of CHD later in life, whereas breastfeeding was associated with a lower CHD risk. Women who both had children and breastfed did have a non-significantly higher risk of CHD.
U2 - 10.1177/2047487316658571
DO - 10.1177/2047487316658571
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 27378766
SN - 2047-4873
VL - 23
SP - 1755
EP - 1765
JO - European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
JF - European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
IS - 16
ER -