TY - JOUR
T1 - Process Simulation and Optimization of Fluid Catalytic Cracking Unit’s Rich Gas Compression System and Absorption Stabilization System
AU - Sun, Jin
AU - Yu, Haoshui
AU - Yin, Zengqi
AU - Jiang, Liangliang
AU - Wang, Li
AU - Hu, Shaolin
AU - Zhou, Rujin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 by the authors.
PY - 2023/7
Y1 - 2023/7
N2 - In a fuel-based refinery, rich gas in the fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) unit is further processed to separate dry gas and refinery products (i.e., stabilized gasoline and liquified petroleum gas). The process is utility-intensive and costly and includes a two-stage compressor, pumps, an absorber, a stripper, a stabilizer, and a re-absorber. The optimization was conducted with respect to the compressor outlet pressure from the gas compression system (GCS) and the flow rate of absorbent and supplementary absorbent from the Absorption-stabilization System (ASS) using the process simulation software Aspen Plus. Compared to the base case of a 725 kt/a rich gas FCC unit, a refinery can save 2.42% of utility costs under optimal operation. Through optimized operation, medium-pressure steam consumption has been reduced by 2.4% compared to the base case, resulting in a significant improvement in total operational cost. The optimization strategy can provide insightful guidance for the practical operation of GCS and ASS.
AB - In a fuel-based refinery, rich gas in the fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) unit is further processed to separate dry gas and refinery products (i.e., stabilized gasoline and liquified petroleum gas). The process is utility-intensive and costly and includes a two-stage compressor, pumps, an absorber, a stripper, a stabilizer, and a re-absorber. The optimization was conducted with respect to the compressor outlet pressure from the gas compression system (GCS) and the flow rate of absorbent and supplementary absorbent from the Absorption-stabilization System (ASS) using the process simulation software Aspen Plus. Compared to the base case of a 725 kt/a rich gas FCC unit, a refinery can save 2.42% of utility costs under optimal operation. Through optimized operation, medium-pressure steam consumption has been reduced by 2.4% compared to the base case, resulting in a significant improvement in total operational cost. The optimization strategy can provide insightful guidance for the practical operation of GCS and ASS.
KW - absorption-stabilization system
KW - Aspen Plus
KW - fluid catalytic cracking
KW - fuel-based refinery
KW - rich gas
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85166174605&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/pr11072140
DO - 10.3390/pr11072140
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:85166174605
SN - 2227-9717
VL - 11
JO - Processes
JF - Processes
IS - 7
M1 - 2140
ER -