TY - JOUR
T1 - Recovery of cardiac function following COVID-19 – ECHOVID-19
T2 - a prospective longitudinal cohort study
AU - Lassen, Mats C.H.
AU - Skaarup, Kristoffer Grundtvig
AU - Lind, Jannie N.
AU - Alhakak, Alia S.
AU - Sengeløv, Morten
AU - Nielsen, Anne B.
AU - Simonsen, Jakob
AU - Johansen, Niklas D.
AU - Davidovski, Filip S.
AU - Christensen, Jacob
AU - Bundgaard, Henning
AU - Hassager, Christian
AU - Jabbari, Reza
AU - Carlsen, Jørn
AU - Kirk, Ole
AU - Lindholm, Matias G.
AU - Kristiansen, Ole P.
AU - Nielsen, Olav W.
AU - Ulrik, Charlotte S.
AU - Sivapalan, Pradeesh
AU - Gislason, Gunnar
AU - Møgelvang, Rasmus
AU - Jensen, Gorm B.
AU - Schnohr, Peter
AU - Søgaard, Peter
AU - Solomon, Scott D.
AU - Iversen, Kasper
AU - Jensen, Jens U.S.
AU - Schou, Morten
AU - Biering-Sørensen, Tor
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 European Society of Cardiology
PY - 2021/11
Y1 - 2021/11
N2 - Aims: The degree of cardiovascular sequelae following COVID-19 remains unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate whether cardiac function recovers following COVID-19. Methods and results: A consecutive sample of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 was prospectively included in this longitudinal study. All patients underwent an echocardiographic examination during hospitalization and 2 months later. All participants were successfully matched 1:1 with COVID-19-free controls by age and sex. A total of 91 patients were included (mean age 63 ± 12 years, 59% male). A median of 77 days (interquartile range: 72–92) passed between the two examinations. Right ventricular (RV) function improved following resolution of COVID-19: tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) (2.28 ± 0.40 cm vs. 2.11 ± 0.38 cm, P < 0.001) and RV longitudinal strain (RVLS) (25.3 ± 5.5% vs. 19.9 ± 5.8%, P < 0.001). In contrast, left ventricular (LV) systolic function assessed by global longitudinal strain (GLS) did not significantly improve (17.4 ± 2.9% vs. 17.6 ± 3.3%, P = 0.6). N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide decreased between the two examinations [177.6 (80.3–408.0) ng/L vs. 11.7 (5.7–24.0) ng/L, P < 0.001]. None of the participants had elevated troponins at follow-up compared to 18 (27.7%) during hospitalization. Recovered COVID-19 patients had significantly lower GLS (17.4 ± 2.9% vs. 18.8 ± 2.9%, P < 0.001 and adjusted P = 0.004), TAPSE (2.28 ± 0.40 cm vs. 2.67 ± 0.44 cm, P < 0.001 and adjusted P < 0.001), and RVLS (25.3 ± 5.5% vs. 26.6 ± 5.8%, P = 0.50 and adjusted P < 0.001) compared to matched controls. Conclusion: Acute COVID-19 affected negatively RV function and cardiac biomarkers but recovered following resolution of COVID-19. In contrast, the observed reduced LV function during acute COVID-19 did not improve post-COVID-19. Compared to the matched controls, both LV and RV function remained impaired.
AB - Aims: The degree of cardiovascular sequelae following COVID-19 remains unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate whether cardiac function recovers following COVID-19. Methods and results: A consecutive sample of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 was prospectively included in this longitudinal study. All patients underwent an echocardiographic examination during hospitalization and 2 months later. All participants were successfully matched 1:1 with COVID-19-free controls by age and sex. A total of 91 patients were included (mean age 63 ± 12 years, 59% male). A median of 77 days (interquartile range: 72–92) passed between the two examinations. Right ventricular (RV) function improved following resolution of COVID-19: tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) (2.28 ± 0.40 cm vs. 2.11 ± 0.38 cm, P < 0.001) and RV longitudinal strain (RVLS) (25.3 ± 5.5% vs. 19.9 ± 5.8%, P < 0.001). In contrast, left ventricular (LV) systolic function assessed by global longitudinal strain (GLS) did not significantly improve (17.4 ± 2.9% vs. 17.6 ± 3.3%, P = 0.6). N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide decreased between the two examinations [177.6 (80.3–408.0) ng/L vs. 11.7 (5.7–24.0) ng/L, P < 0.001]. None of the participants had elevated troponins at follow-up compared to 18 (27.7%) during hospitalization. Recovered COVID-19 patients had significantly lower GLS (17.4 ± 2.9% vs. 18.8 ± 2.9%, P < 0.001 and adjusted P = 0.004), TAPSE (2.28 ± 0.40 cm vs. 2.67 ± 0.44 cm, P < 0.001 and adjusted P < 0.001), and RVLS (25.3 ± 5.5% vs. 26.6 ± 5.8%, P = 0.50 and adjusted P < 0.001) compared to matched controls. Conclusion: Acute COVID-19 affected negatively RV function and cardiac biomarkers but recovered following resolution of COVID-19. In contrast, the observed reduced LV function during acute COVID-19 did not improve post-COVID-19. Compared to the matched controls, both LV and RV function remained impaired.
KW - COVID-19
KW - Follow-up
KW - Recovery following COVID-19
KW - Strain echocardiography
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85117115266&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/ejhf.2347
DO - 10.1002/ejhf.2347
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 34514713
AN - SCOPUS:85117115266
SN - 1388-9842
VL - 23
SP - 1903
EP - 1912
JO - European Journal of Heart Failure
JF - European Journal of Heart Failure
IS - 11
ER -