Reply to Oberhauser et al.: The experimental evidence clearly shows that monarch butterflies are almost certainly not true navigators

Henrik Mouritsen; Rachael Derbyshire; Julia Stalleicken; Ole Ø Mouritsen; Barrie J. Frost; D. Ryan Norris

doi:10.1073/pnas.1309282110

Reply to Oberhauser et al. The experimental evidence clearly shows that monarch butterflies are almost certainly not true navigators

Henrik Mouritsen, Rachael Derbyshire, Julia Stalleicken, Ole Ø Mouritsen, Barrie J. Frost, D. Ryan Norris

Research output: Contribution to journal › Letter › peer-review

Original language	English
Article number	E3681
Journal	Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Volume	110
Issue number	39
Number of pages	1
ISSN	0027-8424
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1309282110
Publication status	Published - 24 Sept 2013

Keywords

Animal Migration
Animals
Butterflies
Orientation

Access to Document

10.1073/pnas.1309282110

AUB Link

Search for the material in Aalborg University Library's search engine

Cite this

Mouritsen, H., Derbyshire, R., Stalleicken, J., Mouritsen, O. Ø., Frost, B. J., & Norris, D. R. (2013). Reply to Oberhauser et al. The experimental evidence clearly shows that monarch butterflies are almost certainly not true navigators. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110(39), Article E3681. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1309282110

@article{aa14816b252441808124737b9e7b2a80,

title = "Reply to Oberhauser et al.: The experimental evidence clearly shows that monarch butterflies are almost certainly not true navigators",

keywords = "Animal Migration, Animals, Butterflies, Orientation",

author = "Henrik Mouritsen and Rachael Derbyshire and Julia Stalleicken and Mouritsen, {Ole {\O}} and Frost, {Barrie J.} and Norris, {D. Ryan}",

year = "2013",

month = sep,

day = "24",

doi = "10.1073/pnas.1309282110",

language = "English",

volume = "110",

journal = "Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America",

issn = "0027-8424",

publisher = "The National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America",

number = "39",

}

Mouritsen, H, Derbyshire, R, Stalleicken, J, Mouritsen, OØ, Frost, BJ & Norris, DR 2013, 'Reply to Oberhauser et al. The experimental evidence clearly shows that monarch butterflies are almost certainly not true navigators', Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 110, no. 39, E3681. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1309282110

Reply to Oberhauser et al. The experimental evidence clearly shows that monarch butterflies are almost certainly not true navigators. / Mouritsen, Henrik; Derbyshire, Rachael; Stalleicken, Julia et al.
In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Vol. 110, No. 39, E3681, 24.09.2013.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Letter › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reply to Oberhauser et al.

T2 - The experimental evidence clearly shows that monarch butterflies are almost certainly not true navigators

AU - Mouritsen, Henrik

AU - Derbyshire, Rachael

AU - Stalleicken, Julia

AU - Mouritsen, Ole Ø

AU - Frost, Barrie J.

AU - Norris, D. Ryan

PY - 2013/9/24

Y1 - 2013/9/24

KW - Animal Migration

KW - Animals

KW - Butterflies

KW - Orientation

U2 - 10.1073/pnas.1309282110

DO - 10.1073/pnas.1309282110

M3 - Letter

C2 - 24191354

SN - 0027-8424

VL - 110

JO - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

JF - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

IS - 39

M1 - E3681

ER -