Rough or Noisy? Metrics for Noise Estimation in SfM Reconstructions

Ivan Adriyanov Nikolov*, Claus Brøndgaard Madsen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)
61 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Structure from Motion (SfM) can produce highly detailed 3D reconstructions, but distinguishing real surface roughness from reconstruction noise and geometric inaccuracies has always been a difficult problem to solve. Existing SfM commercial solutions achieve noise removal by a combination of aggressive global smoothing and the reconstructed texture for smaller details, which is a subpar solution when the results are used for surface inspection. Other noise estimation and removal algorithms do not take advantage of all the additional data connected with SfM. We propose a number of geometrical and statistical metrics for noise assessment, based on both the reconstructed object and the capturing camera setup. We test the correlation of each of the metrics to the presence of noise on reconstructed surfaces and demonstrate that classical supervised learning methods, trained with these metrics can be used to distinguish between noise and roughness with an accuracy above 85%, with an additional 5–6% performance coming from the capturing setup metrics. Our proposed solution can easily be integrated into existing SfM workflows as it does not require more image data or additional sensors. Finally, as part of the testing we create an image dataset for SfM from a number of objects with varying shapes and sizes, which are available online together with ground truth annotations.
Original languageEnglish
Article number5725
JournalSensors
Volume20
Issue number19
Pages (from-to)1-23
Number of pages23
ISSN1424-8220
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 8 Oct 2020

Keywords

  • 3D reconstruction
  • Noise estimation
  • Point clouds
  • Roughness
  • Structure from Motion (SfM)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Rough or Noisy? Metrics for Noise Estimation in SfM Reconstructions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this