Comparison of test methods for mould growth in buildings

Research output: Contribution to book/anthology/report/conference proceedingArticle in proceedingResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The purpose of this work is to compare a range of test methods and kits for assessing whether a building structure is infested by mould fungi. A further purpose of this work is to evaluate whether air-based methods for sampling fungal emissions provide information qualifying decisions concerning renovation needs. This is of importance when hidden surface testing would require destructive measures and subsequent renovation. After identifying available methods on the Danish market for assessing mould growth in dwellings, a case study was conducted to test the usefulness of the methods in four dwellings of different typology and with or without known mould infestations. In each dwelling seven methods were used in parallel. The criteria for choosing the different methods were that they had to be nondestructive, relatively quick and easy, and frequently used by building professionals. The chosen methods measure different aspects relating to mould growth and vary in selectivity and precision. The two types of air samples indicated low levels of mould growth, even where the results of the other methods indicated high to moderate growth. With methods based on culture and DNA testing some differences in the species that each identified were apparent. In conclusion we found visual and olfactory inspection to be quite indicative of mould growth while none of the surface tests gave the complete representation as stand-alone tests. The air sampling methods seemed only to react to very comprehensive infestation with fungi.
Translated title of the contributionSammenligning af testmetoder for skimmelvækst i bygninger
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationCLIMA 2016 - proceedings of the 12th REHVA World Congress: volume 7
EditorsPer Kvols Heiselberg
Number of pages12
Place of PublicationAalborg
PublisherAalborg University. Department of Civil Engineering
Publication date2016
Article number105
ISBN (Electronic)87-91606-32-2 (vol.7), 87-91606-36-5 (set)
Publication statusPublished - 2016
EventCLIMA 2016 - 12th REHVA World Congress - Aalborg Congress & Culture Centre (AKKC), Aalborg, Denmark
Duration: 22 May 201625 May 2016
Conference number: 12
http://www.clima2016.org/welcome.aspx

Conference

ConferenceCLIMA 2016 - 12th REHVA World Congress
Number12
LocationAalborg Congress & Culture Centre (AKKC)
CountryDenmark
CityAalborg
Period22/05/201625/05/2016
Internet address

Fingerprint

comparison
test
method
fungus
air sampling
air
typology
DNA
market
sampling
dwelling
need
decision
inspection

Cite this

Bonderup, S., Gunnarsen, L. B., & Knudsen, S. M. (2016). Comparison of test methods for mould growth in buildings. In P. K. Heiselberg (Ed.), CLIMA 2016 - proceedings of the 12th REHVA World Congress: volume 7 [105] Aalborg: Aalborg University. Department of Civil Engineering.
Bonderup, Sirid ; Gunnarsen, Lars Bo ; Knudsen, Sofie Marie. / Comparison of test methods for mould growth in buildings. CLIMA 2016 - proceedings of the 12th REHVA World Congress: volume 7. editor / Per Kvols Heiselberg. Aalborg : Aalborg University. Department of Civil Engineering, 2016.
@inproceedings{b27f21cc43014a1abe9ce0912523b675,
title = "Comparison of test methods for mould growth in buildings",
abstract = "The purpose of this work is to compare a range of test methods and kits for assessing whether a building structure is infested by mould fungi. A further purpose of this work is to evaluate whether air-based methods for sampling fungal emissions provide information qualifying decisions concerning renovation needs. This is of importance when hidden surface testing would require destructive measures and subsequent renovation. After identifying available methods on the Danish market for assessing mould growth in dwellings, a case study was conducted to test the usefulness of the methods in four dwellings of different typology and with or without known mould infestations. In each dwelling seven methods were used in parallel. The criteria for choosing the different methods were that they had to be nondestructive, relatively quick and easy, and frequently used by building professionals. The chosen methods measure different aspects relating to mould growth and vary in selectivity and precision. The two types of air samples indicated low levels of mould growth, even where the results of the other methods indicated high to moderate growth. With methods based on culture and DNA testing some differences in the species that each identified were apparent. In conclusion we found visual and olfactory inspection to be quite indicative of mould growth while none of the surface tests gave the complete representation as stand-alone tests. The air sampling methods seemed only to react to very comprehensive infestation with fungi.",
author = "Sirid Bonderup and Gunnarsen, {Lars Bo} and Knudsen, {Sofie Marie}",
year = "2016",
language = "English",
editor = "Heiselberg, {Per Kvols}",
booktitle = "CLIMA 2016 - proceedings of the 12th REHVA World Congress: volume 7",
publisher = "Aalborg University. Department of Civil Engineering",

}

Bonderup, S, Gunnarsen, LB & Knudsen, SM 2016, Comparison of test methods for mould growth in buildings. in PK Heiselberg (ed.), CLIMA 2016 - proceedings of the 12th REHVA World Congress: volume 7., 105, Aalborg University. Department of Civil Engineering, Aalborg, CLIMA 2016 - 12th REHVA World Congress, Aalborg, Denmark, 22/05/2016.

Comparison of test methods for mould growth in buildings. / Bonderup, Sirid; Gunnarsen, Lars Bo; Knudsen, Sofie Marie.

CLIMA 2016 - proceedings of the 12th REHVA World Congress: volume 7. ed. / Per Kvols Heiselberg. Aalborg : Aalborg University. Department of Civil Engineering, 2016. 105.

Research output: Contribution to book/anthology/report/conference proceedingArticle in proceedingResearchpeer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - Comparison of test methods for mould growth in buildings

AU - Bonderup, Sirid

AU - Gunnarsen, Lars Bo

AU - Knudsen, Sofie Marie

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - The purpose of this work is to compare a range of test methods and kits for assessing whether a building structure is infested by mould fungi. A further purpose of this work is to evaluate whether air-based methods for sampling fungal emissions provide information qualifying decisions concerning renovation needs. This is of importance when hidden surface testing would require destructive measures and subsequent renovation. After identifying available methods on the Danish market for assessing mould growth in dwellings, a case study was conducted to test the usefulness of the methods in four dwellings of different typology and with or without known mould infestations. In each dwelling seven methods were used in parallel. The criteria for choosing the different methods were that they had to be nondestructive, relatively quick and easy, and frequently used by building professionals. The chosen methods measure different aspects relating to mould growth and vary in selectivity and precision. The two types of air samples indicated low levels of mould growth, even where the results of the other methods indicated high to moderate growth. With methods based on culture and DNA testing some differences in the species that each identified were apparent. In conclusion we found visual and olfactory inspection to be quite indicative of mould growth while none of the surface tests gave the complete representation as stand-alone tests. The air sampling methods seemed only to react to very comprehensive infestation with fungi.

AB - The purpose of this work is to compare a range of test methods and kits for assessing whether a building structure is infested by mould fungi. A further purpose of this work is to evaluate whether air-based methods for sampling fungal emissions provide information qualifying decisions concerning renovation needs. This is of importance when hidden surface testing would require destructive measures and subsequent renovation. After identifying available methods on the Danish market for assessing mould growth in dwellings, a case study was conducted to test the usefulness of the methods in four dwellings of different typology and with or without known mould infestations. In each dwelling seven methods were used in parallel. The criteria for choosing the different methods were that they had to be nondestructive, relatively quick and easy, and frequently used by building professionals. The chosen methods measure different aspects relating to mould growth and vary in selectivity and precision. The two types of air samples indicated low levels of mould growth, even where the results of the other methods indicated high to moderate growth. With methods based on culture and DNA testing some differences in the species that each identified were apparent. In conclusion we found visual and olfactory inspection to be quite indicative of mould growth while none of the surface tests gave the complete representation as stand-alone tests. The air sampling methods seemed only to react to very comprehensive infestation with fungi.

M3 - Article in proceeding

BT - CLIMA 2016 - proceedings of the 12th REHVA World Congress: volume 7

A2 - Heiselberg, Per Kvols

PB - Aalborg University. Department of Civil Engineering

CY - Aalborg

ER -

Bonderup S, Gunnarsen LB, Knudsen SM. Comparison of test methods for mould growth in buildings. In Heiselberg PK, editor, CLIMA 2016 - proceedings of the 12th REHVA World Congress: volume 7. Aalborg: Aalborg University. Department of Civil Engineering. 2016. 105