Science, uncertainty and changing storylines in nature restoration: The case of seagrass restoration in the Dutch Wadden Sea

Judith R. Floor, C.S.A. (Kris) van Koppen, Jan P.M van Tatenhove

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Marine areas have been heavily affected by human activities, resulting in current attempts to both conserve and restore nature. In decisions about nature restoration, ecological knowledge plays a crucial role and is closely linked to nature preferences and political views. In this study, the empirical case of seagrass (Zostera marina) restoration in the Dutch Wadden Sea (1989–2017) is analysed. The impact of storylines and uncertainty perceptions, together with socio-political context factors, on decisions concerning restoration action and research are investigated. This case illustrates the difficulties of establishing seagrass fields and the dynamic process in which meaning is attributed to nature restoration. Two basic storylines – authenticity and the ecological function of ecosystem engineers – supported the restoration efforts. Three different episodes are distinguished based on different views of research in restoration efforts. The dominant perception of uncertainty was incomplete knowledge, and this perception resulted in research projects. Furthermore, the unpredictability of the success of restoration efforts and the ambiguity regarding the feasibility of restoration also influenced decisions. Two concepts – ecosystem engineer and pilot project – facilitated collaboration among science-based experts, NGOs and governmental organisations.
Original languageEnglish
JournalOcean & Coastal Management
Volume157
Pages (from-to)227–236
Number of pages10
ISSN0964-5691
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2018

Cite this

@article{439ff7e0142f4897ba63786edf6f96fd,
title = "Science, uncertainty and changing storylines in nature restoration: The case of seagrass restoration in the Dutch Wadden Sea",
abstract = "Marine areas have been heavily affected by human activities, resulting in current attempts to both conserve and restore nature. In decisions about nature restoration, ecological knowledge plays a crucial role and is closely linked to nature preferences and political views. In this study, the empirical case of seagrass (Zostera marina) restoration in the Dutch Wadden Sea (1989–2017) is analysed. The impact of storylines and uncertainty perceptions, together with socio-political context factors, on decisions concerning restoration action and research are investigated. This case illustrates the difficulties of establishing seagrass fields and the dynamic process in which meaning is attributed to nature restoration. Two basic storylines – authenticity and the ecological function of ecosystem engineers – supported the restoration efforts. Three different episodes are distinguished based on different views of research in restoration efforts. The dominant perception of uncertainty was incomplete knowledge, and this perception resulted in research projects. Furthermore, the unpredictability of the success of restoration efforts and the ambiguity regarding the feasibility of restoration also influenced decisions. Two concepts – ecosystem engineer and pilot project – facilitated collaboration among science-based experts, NGOs and governmental organisations.",
author = "{R. Floor}, Judith and {(Kris) van Koppen}, C.S.A. and Tatenhove, {Jan P.M van}",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2018.02.016",
language = "English",
volume = "157",
pages = "227–236",
journal = "Ocean & Coastal Management",
issn = "0964-5691",
publisher = "Pergamon Press",

}

Science, uncertainty and changing storylines in nature restoration : The case of seagrass restoration in the Dutch Wadden Sea. / R. Floor, Judith; (Kris) van Koppen, C.S.A. ; Tatenhove, Jan P.M van.

In: Ocean & Coastal Management, Vol. 157, 01.05.2018, p. 227–236.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Science, uncertainty and changing storylines in nature restoration

T2 - The case of seagrass restoration in the Dutch Wadden Sea

AU - R. Floor, Judith

AU - (Kris) van Koppen, C.S.A.

AU - Tatenhove, Jan P.M van

PY - 2018/5/1

Y1 - 2018/5/1

N2 - Marine areas have been heavily affected by human activities, resulting in current attempts to both conserve and restore nature. In decisions about nature restoration, ecological knowledge plays a crucial role and is closely linked to nature preferences and political views. In this study, the empirical case of seagrass (Zostera marina) restoration in the Dutch Wadden Sea (1989–2017) is analysed. The impact of storylines and uncertainty perceptions, together with socio-political context factors, on decisions concerning restoration action and research are investigated. This case illustrates the difficulties of establishing seagrass fields and the dynamic process in which meaning is attributed to nature restoration. Two basic storylines – authenticity and the ecological function of ecosystem engineers – supported the restoration efforts. Three different episodes are distinguished based on different views of research in restoration efforts. The dominant perception of uncertainty was incomplete knowledge, and this perception resulted in research projects. Furthermore, the unpredictability of the success of restoration efforts and the ambiguity regarding the feasibility of restoration also influenced decisions. Two concepts – ecosystem engineer and pilot project – facilitated collaboration among science-based experts, NGOs and governmental organisations.

AB - Marine areas have been heavily affected by human activities, resulting in current attempts to both conserve and restore nature. In decisions about nature restoration, ecological knowledge plays a crucial role and is closely linked to nature preferences and political views. In this study, the empirical case of seagrass (Zostera marina) restoration in the Dutch Wadden Sea (1989–2017) is analysed. The impact of storylines and uncertainty perceptions, together with socio-political context factors, on decisions concerning restoration action and research are investigated. This case illustrates the difficulties of establishing seagrass fields and the dynamic process in which meaning is attributed to nature restoration. Two basic storylines – authenticity and the ecological function of ecosystem engineers – supported the restoration efforts. Three different episodes are distinguished based on different views of research in restoration efforts. The dominant perception of uncertainty was incomplete knowledge, and this perception resulted in research projects. Furthermore, the unpredictability of the success of restoration efforts and the ambiguity regarding the feasibility of restoration also influenced decisions. Two concepts – ecosystem engineer and pilot project – facilitated collaboration among science-based experts, NGOs and governmental organisations.

U2 - 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2018.02.016

DO - 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2018.02.016

M3 - Journal article

VL - 157

SP - 227

EP - 236

JO - Ocean & Coastal Management

JF - Ocean & Coastal Management

SN - 0964-5691

ER -