Security and labour market flexibility: an alternative view from Denmark

Bjarke Refslund, Stine Rasmussen, Ole H. Sørensen

Research output: Contribution to book/anthology/report/conference proceedingBook chapterResearchpeer-review

30 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In the face of the economic and financial crisis, several European countries have
implemented a number of structural reforms to increase employment and the flexibility of the labour market, in particular by reducing employment protection in an effort to deregulate labour markets. Reform proponents believe that a reduction of the gap between the protection of regular and non-standard contracts will decrease the alleged disincentives to offer permanent contracts, which should then lead to an increase in open-ended employment contracts and, thereafter, to greater productivity and consequently higher employment. Conversely, reform opponents claim that this view builds on a misguided view of labour market dynamics. They do not believe that such reforms will lead to job growth, asserting that such reforms are as likely to reduce as to increase employment and that they will lead to growing inequality and labour market segmentation.
In Denmark, employee protection in terms of notice periods and dismissal compensation, which is mainly regulated by collective agreement, is among the lowest in the EU. Unemployment was, before the crisis, among the lowest in the EU but the crisis also negatively affected employment in Denmark. However, there have been no major moves to deregulate employment protection; probably because flexibility is already high in the so-called Danish flexicurity model and because much of employment protection is settled in the collective agreements.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationMyths of employment deregulation: how it neither creates jobs nor reduces labour market segmentation
EditorsAgnieszka Piasna , Martin Myant
Place of PublicationBrussels
PublisherEuropean Trade Union Institute (ETUI)
Publication dateMay 2017
Pages207-224
Chapter10
ISBN (Print)978-2-87452-442-4
ISBN (Electronic)978-2-87452-443-1
Publication statusPublished - May 2017

Fingerprint

Securities market
Denmark
Labour market flexibility
Employment protection
Labour market
Collective agreements
Labour market segmentation
Unemployment
Employment contracts
Economic crisis
Structural reforms
Productivity
Labor market dynamics
European countries
Employees
Flexicurity
Financial crisis

Keywords

  • Labour market
  • deregulation
  • flexicurity
  • Employment

Cite this

Refslund, B., Rasmussen, S., & Sørensen, O. H. (2017). Security and labour market flexibility: an alternative view from Denmark. In A. Piasna , & M. Myant (Eds.), Myths of employment deregulation: : how it neither creates jobs nor reduces labour market segmentation (pp. 207-224). Brussels: European Trade Union Institute (ETUI).
Refslund, Bjarke ; Rasmussen, Stine ; Sørensen, Ole H. / Security and labour market flexibility : an alternative view from Denmark. Myths of employment deregulation: : how it neither creates jobs nor reduces labour market segmentation. editor / Agnieszka Piasna ; Martin Myant. Brussels : European Trade Union Institute (ETUI), 2017. pp. 207-224
@inbook{c1d2766009c642848dc018b9619ca61f,
title = "Security and labour market flexibility: an alternative view from Denmark",
abstract = "In the face of the economic and financial crisis, several European countries haveimplemented a number of structural reforms to increase employment and the flexibility of the labour market, in particular by reducing employment protection in an effort to deregulate labour markets. Reform proponents believe that a reduction of the gap between the protection of regular and non-standard contracts will decrease the alleged disincentives to offer permanent contracts, which should then lead to an increase in open-ended employment contracts and, thereafter, to greater productivity and consequently higher employment. Conversely, reform opponents claim that this view builds on a misguided view of labour market dynamics. They do not believe that such reforms will lead to job growth, asserting that such reforms are as likely to reduce as to increase employment and that they will lead to growing inequality and labour market segmentation.In Denmark, employee protection in terms of notice periods and dismissal compensation, which is mainly regulated by collective agreement, is among the lowest in the EU. Unemployment was, before the crisis, among the lowest in the EU but the crisis also negatively affected employment in Denmark. However, there have been no major moves to deregulate employment protection; probably because flexibility is already high in the so-called Danish flexicurity model and because much of employment protection is settled in the collective agreements.",
keywords = "Labour market, deregulation, flexicurity, Employment",
author = "Bjarke Refslund and Stine Rasmussen and S{\o}rensen, {Ole H.}",
year = "2017",
month = "5",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-2-87452-442-4",
pages = "207--224",
editor = "{Piasna }, {Agnieszka } and Martin Myant",
booktitle = "Myths of employment deregulation:",
publisher = "European Trade Union Institute (ETUI)",

}

Refslund, B, Rasmussen, S & Sørensen, OH 2017, Security and labour market flexibility: an alternative view from Denmark. in A Piasna & M Myant (eds), Myths of employment deregulation: : how it neither creates jobs nor reduces labour market segmentation. European Trade Union Institute (ETUI), Brussels, pp. 207-224.

Security and labour market flexibility : an alternative view from Denmark. / Refslund, Bjarke; Rasmussen, Stine; Sørensen, Ole H.

Myths of employment deregulation: : how it neither creates jobs nor reduces labour market segmentation. ed. / Agnieszka Piasna ; Martin Myant. Brussels : European Trade Union Institute (ETUI), 2017. p. 207-224.

Research output: Contribution to book/anthology/report/conference proceedingBook chapterResearchpeer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - Security and labour market flexibility

T2 - an alternative view from Denmark

AU - Refslund, Bjarke

AU - Rasmussen, Stine

AU - Sørensen, Ole H.

PY - 2017/5

Y1 - 2017/5

N2 - In the face of the economic and financial crisis, several European countries haveimplemented a number of structural reforms to increase employment and the flexibility of the labour market, in particular by reducing employment protection in an effort to deregulate labour markets. Reform proponents believe that a reduction of the gap between the protection of regular and non-standard contracts will decrease the alleged disincentives to offer permanent contracts, which should then lead to an increase in open-ended employment contracts and, thereafter, to greater productivity and consequently higher employment. Conversely, reform opponents claim that this view builds on a misguided view of labour market dynamics. They do not believe that such reforms will lead to job growth, asserting that such reforms are as likely to reduce as to increase employment and that they will lead to growing inequality and labour market segmentation.In Denmark, employee protection in terms of notice periods and dismissal compensation, which is mainly regulated by collective agreement, is among the lowest in the EU. Unemployment was, before the crisis, among the lowest in the EU but the crisis also negatively affected employment in Denmark. However, there have been no major moves to deregulate employment protection; probably because flexibility is already high in the so-called Danish flexicurity model and because much of employment protection is settled in the collective agreements.

AB - In the face of the economic and financial crisis, several European countries haveimplemented a number of structural reforms to increase employment and the flexibility of the labour market, in particular by reducing employment protection in an effort to deregulate labour markets. Reform proponents believe that a reduction of the gap between the protection of regular and non-standard contracts will decrease the alleged disincentives to offer permanent contracts, which should then lead to an increase in open-ended employment contracts and, thereafter, to greater productivity and consequently higher employment. Conversely, reform opponents claim that this view builds on a misguided view of labour market dynamics. They do not believe that such reforms will lead to job growth, asserting that such reforms are as likely to reduce as to increase employment and that they will lead to growing inequality and labour market segmentation.In Denmark, employee protection in terms of notice periods and dismissal compensation, which is mainly regulated by collective agreement, is among the lowest in the EU. Unemployment was, before the crisis, among the lowest in the EU but the crisis also negatively affected employment in Denmark. However, there have been no major moves to deregulate employment protection; probably because flexibility is already high in the so-called Danish flexicurity model and because much of employment protection is settled in the collective agreements.

KW - Labour market

KW - deregulation

KW - flexicurity

KW - Employment

UR - https://www.etui.org/Publications2/Books/Myths-of-employment-deregulation-how-it-neither-creates-jobs-nor-reduces-labour-market-segmentation

M3 - Book chapter

SN - 978-2-87452-442-4

SP - 207

EP - 224

BT - Myths of employment deregulation:

A2 - Piasna , Agnieszka

A2 - Myant, Martin

PB - European Trade Union Institute (ETUI)

CY - Brussels

ER -

Refslund B, Rasmussen S, Sørensen OH. Security and labour market flexibility: an alternative view from Denmark. In Piasna A, Myant M, editors, Myths of employment deregulation: : how it neither creates jobs nor reduces labour market segmentation. Brussels: European Trade Union Institute (ETUI). 2017. p. 207-224