Should biogenic carbon be analysed separately in the calculation of the GWP indicator?

Endrit Hoxha, Alexander Passer

Research output: Contribution to journalConference article in JournalResearchpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The life cycle assessment method is widely accepted for calculating the environmental impacts of buildings. However, the approaches used to translate greenhouse gas emissions to a global warming potential score are largely criticised. By following a static approach (known as 0/0) and a time-dependent approach (known as dynamic) in this paper, we assessed the environmental impacts of two buildings with structures made of reinforced concrete and wood, respectively. The relative difference between the results calculated with the 0/0 approach and the time-dependent approach were larger for the building with the wooden structure. A more detailed analysis identified biogenic carbon as the source that was most responsible for this difference in results. For this reason, biogenic carbon should be treated separately and must be calculated with the time-dependent approach. Meanwhile, the impacts from fossil energy sources should be calculated with the 0/0 approach.

Original languageEnglish
Article number012168
Book seriesJournal of Physics: Conference Series
Volume2042
Issue number1
ISSN1742-6588
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 18 Nov 2021
Externally publishedYes
Event2021 International Hybrid Conference on Carbon Neutral Cities - Energy Efficiency and Renewables in the Digital Era, CISBAT 2021 - Lausanne, Virtual, Switzerland
Duration: 8 Sept 202110 Sept 2021

Conference

Conference2021 International Hybrid Conference on Carbon Neutral Cities - Energy Efficiency and Renewables in the Digital Era, CISBAT 2021
Country/TerritorySwitzerland
CityLausanne, Virtual
Period08/09/202110/09/2021
SponsorÉcole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne (EPFL), Swiss Federal Office of Energy (SFOE)

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
The analysis and results described in this paper relate to ongoing research within the international project IEA EBC Annex 72 and ParisBuildings, which are financially supported by the Austrian Ministry for Transport, Innovation and Technology (BMVIT) via the Austrian Research Promotion Agency (FFG) Grant #864142 and the Klima- und Energiefonds, ACRP11 KR18AC0K14693. The authors also wish to thank Marcella Mendes Ruschi Saade for her feedbacks and suggestions.

Funding Information:
The analysis and results described in this paper relate to ongoing research within the international project IEA EBC Annex 72 and ParisBuildings, which are financially supported by the Austrian Ministry for Transport, Innovation and Technology (BMVIT) via the Austrian Research Promotion Agency (FFG) Grant #864142 and the Klima-und Energiefonds, ACRP11 KR18AC0K14693. The authors also wish to thank Marcella Mendes Ruschi Saade for her feedbacks and suggestions.

Publisher Copyright:
© Content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Licence.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Should biogenic carbon be analysed separately in the calculation of the GWP indicator?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this