Simulation training for residents focused on mechanical ventilation: A randomized trial using mannequin-based versus computer-based simulation

Savino Spadaro, Dan Stieper Karbing, Alberto Fogagnolo, Riccardo Ragazzi, Francesco Mojoli, Luca Astolfi, Antonio Gioia, Elisabetta Marangoni, Stephen Edward Rees, Volta Alberto Carlo

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

34 Citations (Scopus)
246 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Advances in knowledge regarding mechanical ventilation (MV), in particular lung-protective ventilation strategies, have been shown to reduce mortality. However, the translation of these advances in knowledge into better therapeutic performance in real-life clinical settings continues to lag. High-fidelity simulation with a mannequin allows students to interact in lifelike situations; this may be a valuable addition to traditional didactic teaching. The purpose of this study is to compare computer-based and mannequin-based approaches for training residents on MV.

METHODS: This prospective randomized single-blind trial involved 50 residents. All participants attended the same didactic lecture on respiratory pathophysiology and were subsequently randomized into two groups: the mannequin group (n = 25) and the computer screenbased simulator group (n = 25). One week later, each underwent a training assessment using five different scenarios of acute respiratory failure of different etiologies. Later, both groups underwent further testing of patient management, using in situ high-fidelity simulation of a patient with acute respiratory distress syndrome.

RESULTS: Baseline knowledge was not significantly different between the two groups (P = 0.72). Regarding the training assessment, no significant differences were detected between the groups. In the final assessment, the scores of only the mannequin group significantly improved between the training and final session in terms of either global rating score [3.0 (2.54.0) vs. 2.0 (2.03.0), P = 0.005] or percentage of key score (82% vs. 71%, P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS: Mannequin-based simulation has the potential to improve skills in managing MV.This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.

Original languageEnglish
JournalSimulation in Healthcare
Volume12
Issue number6
Pages (from-to)349-355
ISSN1559-2332
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Keywords

  • Journal Article

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Simulation training for residents focused on mechanical ventilation: A randomized trial using mannequin-based versus computer-based simulation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this