Socioeconomic Inequalities in Reperfusion Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke

Sine Mette Øgendahl Buus*, Marie Louise Schmitz, Pia Cordsen, Søren Paaske Johnsen, Grethe Andersen, Claus Ziegler Simonsen*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reperfusion therapies (thrombolysis and thrombectomy) are of paramount importance for the recovery after ischemic stroke. We aimed to investigate if socioeconomic status (SES) was associated with the chance of receiving reperfusion therapy for ischemic stroke in a country with tax-funded health care.

METHODS: This nationwide register-based cohort study included patients with ischemic stroke registered in the Danish Stroke Registry between 2015 and 2018. SES was determined by prestroke educational attainment, income level, and employment status. Data on SES was obtained from Statistics Denmark and linked on an individual level with data from the Danish Stroke Registry. Risk ratios (RR) for receiving reperfusion therapies were calculated using univariate and multivariable Poisson regression with robust variance.

RESULTS: A total of 37 187 ischemic stroke patients were included. Low SES, as defined by education, income and employment status, was associated with lower treatment rates. The socioeconomic gradient was most pronounced according to employment status, with intravenous thrombolysis rates of 23.7% versus 15.8%, and thrombectomy rates of 5.1% versus 2.8% for employed versus unemployed patients. When the analyses were restricted to patients with timely hospital arrival, and adjusted for age, sex and immigrant status, low SES according to income and employment remained unfavorable for the likelihood of receiving intravenous thrombolysis: adjusted RR, 0.90 (95% CI, 0.86-0.95) for low versus high income, and adjusted RR, 0.77 (95% CI, 0.71-0.84) for unemployed versus employed patients. Similarly, low SES according to income and employment status remained unfavorable for the likelihood of receiving thrombectomy: adjusted RR, 0.83 (95% CI, 0.72-0.95) for low versus high income and adjusted RR, 0.68 (95% CI, 0.53-0.88) for unemployed versus employed patients.

CONCLUSIONS: Socioeconomic inequalities in reperfusion treatment rates among ischemic stroke patients prevail, even in a country with tax-funded universal health care.

Original languageEnglish
JournalStroke
Volume53
Issue number7
Pages (from-to)2307-2316
Number of pages10
ISSN0039-2499
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2022

Keywords

  • Brain Ischemia/surgery
  • Cohort Studies
  • Humans
  • Ischemic Stroke
  • Reperfusion
  • Social Class
  • Stroke/epidemiology
  • Thrombectomy
  • Treatment Outcome
  • thrombectomy
  • socioeconomic factors
  • healthcare disparities
  • employment
  • thrombolytic therapy
  • reperfusion
  • ischemic stroke

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Socioeconomic Inequalities in Reperfusion Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this