Abstract
The need for ‘soft’ (non-mandatory) tourism planning has long been recognised in the tourism planning literature (Gunn & Var, 2002). Although planning for tourism can be seen as a form of sectoral planning (Halkier, 2010), that fact that this socio-economic activity has a strong spatial dimension in that it takes place in particular locales, tourist destinations, that may or may not correspond to existing borders between e.g. local authorities. ‘Soft’ tourism planning and land-use planning are in other words likely from the outset to exist in a potentially awkward relationship.
In Denmark the 2007 local government reform gave rise to significant increase in non-statutory planning (Hansen, 2017), bringing with it a generally ‘softer’ planning culture in Danish municipalities. This paper argues, however, that the basic tensions around ‘soft’ tourism planning remain ongoing challenges that public and private stakeholders need to address, in particular 1) inter-municipal relationship when planning for tourist destinations cut across existing political borders, and 2) relations between public, private and civic stakeholders in ‘soft’ planning processes.
The paper proceeds in four steps. First a review of the existing literature on ‘soft’ tourism planning, focusing especially on its relationship to other forms of spatial planning. Then a comparative analysis is undertaken between the pre-2007 and post-2007 periods (Henriksen & Halkier, 2009; James & Halkier, 2019), focusing on prominent examples of ‘soft’ tourism planning in Denmark (Regional Tourist Boards and inter-municipal tourism alliances in the early period, inter-regional alliances and Destination Management Organisations in the later period). The paper concludes with a discussion of the evolving challenges of ‘soft’ tourism planning, arguing that the challenges of horizontal coordination between municipalities and engagement of relevant stakeholders may have taken new forms but remains difficult territory to navigate for all parties involved.
The paper is part of UP:DK project sponsored by Realdania, Dansk Kyst & Natur Turisme, and Aalborg University.
In Denmark the 2007 local government reform gave rise to significant increase in non-statutory planning (Hansen, 2017), bringing with it a generally ‘softer’ planning culture in Danish municipalities. This paper argues, however, that the basic tensions around ‘soft’ tourism planning remain ongoing challenges that public and private stakeholders need to address, in particular 1) inter-municipal relationship when planning for tourist destinations cut across existing political borders, and 2) relations between public, private and civic stakeholders in ‘soft’ planning processes.
The paper proceeds in four steps. First a review of the existing literature on ‘soft’ tourism planning, focusing especially on its relationship to other forms of spatial planning. Then a comparative analysis is undertaken between the pre-2007 and post-2007 periods (Henriksen & Halkier, 2009; James & Halkier, 2019), focusing on prominent examples of ‘soft’ tourism planning in Denmark (Regional Tourist Boards and inter-municipal tourism alliances in the early period, inter-regional alliances and Destination Management Organisations in the later period). The paper concludes with a discussion of the evolving challenges of ‘soft’ tourism planning, arguing that the challenges of horizontal coordination between municipalities and engagement of relevant stakeholders may have taken new forms but remains difficult territory to navigate for all parties involved.
The paper is part of UP:DK project sponsored by Realdania, Dansk Kyst & Natur Turisme, and Aalborg University.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Publication date | 22 Aug 2024 |
Publication status | Published - 22 Aug 2024 |
Event | PLANNORD 2024 - Reykjavík, Iceland Duration: 21 Aug 2024 → 23 Aug 2024 https://plannord2024.is/ |
Conference
Conference | PLANNORD 2024 |
---|---|
Country/Territory | Iceland |
City | Reykjavík |
Period | 21/08/2024 → 23/08/2024 |
Internet address |