TY - JOUR
T1 - Standalone and system-level perspectives on hydrogen-based sustainable aviation fuel pathways for Denmark
AU - Abid, Hamza
AU - Skov, Iva Ridjan
AU - Mathiesen, Brian Vad
AU - Østergaard, Poul Alberg
PY - 2025/4/1
Y1 - 2025/4/1
N2 - Aviation is one of the most challenging sectors to electrify directly due to its high energy density demands. Hydrogen offers a pathway for indirect electrification in such sectors, enabling sustainable aviation fuels (SAF) production when combined with a carbon source. SAF produced via methanol or Fischer-Tropsch (FT) synthesis (e-SAF) has higher volumetric density than hydrogen, remains liquid under standard conditions, and can be used as a direct drop-in fuel. Certain FT-based e-SAF pathways are already certified for use in blends, enhancing their appeal for sustainable aviation. This study evaluates e-SAF pathways in terms of resource efficiency and costs for different carbon sources. The results from both a standalone and system-level perspective indicate that biomass gasification-sourced carbon is the most energy-efficient pathway given biomass availability. For point-source and direct air capture pathways, electricity costs for renewable hydrogen dominate the overall costs, comprising about 70% of total e-SAF costs. Given cheap renewable electricity and by-product revenues, e-SAF can achieve price levels of 0.5- 1.1 €/litre, which is cost-competitive with their fossil-based counterparts. A breakeven electricity price of 9-29 €/MWh is needed for e-SAF made via a point source-based CO2 pathway, compared with a moderate aviation fossil fuel price of 0.5 €/litre.
AB - Aviation is one of the most challenging sectors to electrify directly due to its high energy density demands. Hydrogen offers a pathway for indirect electrification in such sectors, enabling sustainable aviation fuels (SAF) production when combined with a carbon source. SAF produced via methanol or Fischer-Tropsch (FT) synthesis (e-SAF) has higher volumetric density than hydrogen, remains liquid under standard conditions, and can be used as a direct drop-in fuel. Certain FT-based e-SAF pathways are already certified for use in blends, enhancing their appeal for sustainable aviation. This study evaluates e-SAF pathways in terms of resource efficiency and costs for different carbon sources. The results from both a standalone and system-level perspective indicate that biomass gasification-sourced carbon is the most energy-efficient pathway given biomass availability. For point-source and direct air capture pathways, electricity costs for renewable hydrogen dominate the overall costs, comprising about 70% of total e-SAF costs. Given cheap renewable electricity and by-product revenues, e-SAF can achieve price levels of 0.5- 1.1 €/litre, which is cost-competitive with their fossil-based counterparts. A breakeven electricity price of 9-29 €/MWh is needed for e-SAF made via a point source-based CO2 pathway, compared with a moderate aviation fossil fuel price of 0.5 €/litre.
KW - Electrofuels
KW - Hydrogen
KW - Smart Energy Systems
KW - Sustainability
KW - E-SAF
KW - Renewable energy system
KW - Energy system analysis
KW - Power-to-liquid
KW - Sustainable aviation fuel
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85219499224&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.energy.2025.135450
DO - 10.1016/j.energy.2025.135450
M3 - Journal article
SN - 0360-5442
VL - 320
SP - 18
JO - Energy
JF - Energy
M1 - 135450
ER -