Synchronous Generator Loss of Field Protection: A Real-Time Realistic Framework and Assessment of Some Recently Proposed Methods

Abbas Hasani, Farhad Haghjoo*, Filipe Faria Da Silva, Claus Leth Bak

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

20 Citations (Scopus)
684 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

A real-time realistic framework for synchronous generator loss of field (LOF) protection studies is suggested in this paper by using the real-time digital simulator, which allows the user to realistically model the generator field supply circuit. By using such framework, the performance of LOF protection algorithms can be comprehensively evaluated in the face of the various LOF events including the short circuit and two types of the open circuit events, while the open circuit occurrence cannot be studied in the conventional simulation programs. The obtained results demonstrate that the generator dynamics are significantly different in the face of various LOF failures and then all of them must be regarded to develop the new LOF protection algorithms. By using the suggested framework, the performance of some recently proposed schemes along with the conventional impedance and the admittance relays are comprehensively evaluated. The obtained results from applying the various LOF failures show that, against the conventional relays, the new schemes cannot detect all types of LOF failures and so, they do not have enough reliability.
Original languageEnglish
Article number8634951
JournalIEEE Transactions on Power Delivery
Volume34
Issue number3
Pages (from-to)971-979
Number of pages9
ISSN0885-8977
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2019

Keywords

  • Excitation system
  • Loss of field
  • Real-time-digital-simulator (RTDS)
  • Synchronous generator protection

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Synchronous Generator Loss of Field Protection: A Real-Time Realistic Framework and Assessment of Some Recently Proposed Methods'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this