Systematic literature review on ICF from 2001 to 2013 in the Nordic countries focusing on clinical and rehabilitation context

Thomas Maribo, Kirsten S. Petersen, Charlotte Handberg, Hanne Melchiorsen, Anne-Mette H Momsen, Claus V. Nielsen, Matilde Leonardi, Merete Labriola

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

91 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

We present a systematic review on International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) used in the Nordic countries from 2001 through 2013, describing and quantifying the development in utilization of ICF, and describe the extent to which the different components of the ICF have been used. A search was conducted in EMBASE, MEDLINE and PsycInfo. Papers from Nordic countries were included if ICF was mentioned in title or abstract. Papers were assigned to one of eight categories covering the wide rehabilitation area; furthermore, area of focus was assigned. Use of ICF components and intervention were coded in papers categorized as "clinical and/or rehabilitation contexts" or "non-clinical contexts". One hundred seventy papers were included, of these 99 papers were from the categories "clinical and/or rehabilitation contexts" or "non-clinical contexts". Forty-two percent of the 170 included papers were published in the period 2011 - 2013. There was an increase in ICF-relevant papers from 2001 to 2013, especially in the categories "clinical and/or rehabilitation contexts" and "non-clinical contexts". The most represented focus areas were neurology, musculoskeletal, and work-related areas. All five or at least four ICF components were mentioned in the results or discussions in most papers, and activity was most frequently mentioned.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Clinical Medicine Research
Volume8
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)1-9
Number of pages9
ISSN1918-3003
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Journal Article
  • Review

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Systematic literature review on ICF from 2001 to 2013 in the Nordic countries focusing on clinical and rehabilitation context'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this