TY - JOUR
T1 - Systematical analysis of sludge treatment and disposal technologies for carbon footprint reduction
AU - Zhao, Yingxin
AU - Yang, Zhifan
AU - Niu, Jiaojiao
AU - Du, Zihan
AU - Federica, Conti
AU - Zhu, Zhe
AU - Yang, Kaichao
AU - Li, Yan
AU - Zhao, Baofeng
AU - Pedersen, Thomas Helmer
AU - Liu, Chunguang
AU - Emmanuel, Mutabazi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022
PY - 2023/6
Y1 - 2023/6
N2 - This study aims to comprehensively analyze the Greenhouse Gases (GHGs) emissions from current sewage sludge treatment and disposal technologies (building material, landfill, land spreading, anaerobic digestion, and thermochemical processes) based on the database of Science Citation Index (SCI) and Social Science Citation Index (SSCI) from 1998 to 2020. The general patterns, spatial distribution, and hotspots were provided by bibliometric analysis. A comparative quantitative analysis based on life cycle assessment (LCA) put forward the current emission situation and the key influencing factors of different technologies. The effective GHG emissions reduction methods were proposed to mitigate climate change. Results showed that incineration or building materials manufacturing of highly dewatered sludge, and land spreading after anaerobic digestion have the best GHG emissions reduction benefits. Biological treatment technologies and thermochemical processes have great potential for reducing GHGs. Enhancement of pretreatment effect, co-digestion, and new technologies (e.g., injection of carbon dioxide, directional acidification) are major approaches to facilitate substitution emissions in sludge anaerobic digestion. The relationship between the quality and efficiency of secondary energy in thermochemical process and GHGs emission still needs further study. Solid sludge products generated by bio-stabilization or thermochemical processes are considered to have a certain carbon sequestration value and can improve the soil environment to control GHG emissions. The findings are useful for future development and processes selection of sludge treatment and disposal facing carbon footprint reduction.
AB - This study aims to comprehensively analyze the Greenhouse Gases (GHGs) emissions from current sewage sludge treatment and disposal technologies (building material, landfill, land spreading, anaerobic digestion, and thermochemical processes) based on the database of Science Citation Index (SCI) and Social Science Citation Index (SSCI) from 1998 to 2020. The general patterns, spatial distribution, and hotspots were provided by bibliometric analysis. A comparative quantitative analysis based on life cycle assessment (LCA) put forward the current emission situation and the key influencing factors of different technologies. The effective GHG emissions reduction methods were proposed to mitigate climate change. Results showed that incineration or building materials manufacturing of highly dewatered sludge, and land spreading after anaerobic digestion have the best GHG emissions reduction benefits. Biological treatment technologies and thermochemical processes have great potential for reducing GHGs. Enhancement of pretreatment effect, co-digestion, and new technologies (e.g., injection of carbon dioxide, directional acidification) are major approaches to facilitate substitution emissions in sludge anaerobic digestion. The relationship between the quality and efficiency of secondary energy in thermochemical process and GHGs emission still needs further study. Solid sludge products generated by bio-stabilization or thermochemical processes are considered to have a certain carbon sequestration value and can improve the soil environment to control GHG emissions. The findings are useful for future development and processes selection of sludge treatment and disposal facing carbon footprint reduction.
KW - Bibliometrics
KW - Greenhouse gas
KW - Life cycle assessment
KW - Sewage sludge
KW - Sludge management
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85143975804&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jes.2022.07.038
DO - 10.1016/j.jes.2022.07.038
M3 - Review article
C2 - 36801037
AN - SCOPUS:85143975804
SN - 1001-0742
VL - 128
SP - 224
EP - 249
JO - Journal of Environmental Sciences (China)
JF - Journal of Environmental Sciences (China)
ER -