Technology gaps and regulatory challenges in Danish case studies: Deliverable D10.4

Nelson F. Coelho, Jesper Raakjær, Bjarke Møller , Peter Bjerg Olesen, Rasmus Hededal, Jan-Jaap Cramer, Jesper Kraft Andersen

Research output: Book/ReportReportResearchpeer-review

85 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This report is part of Work Package 10 of the AEGIS project. This Work Package is focused on Use-Case C, which is about the revitalization of small and medium enterprise ports and terminals and their relocation out of city centres. This report on technology gaps and regulatory challenges in Danish case studies shows how port terminal infrastructure development plays a key role in the development of a new waterborne transport system for Europe. This report highlighted the impact of the AEGIS concept as experienced by Port of Aalborg and by Port of Vordingborg, as small and medium enterprise ports. On the side of technological gaps, the report analyses gaps related to digitalisation in communication and standardisation, cargo handling and infrastructural support for new autonomous vessels, namely
the capabilities of small and medium enterprise ports. It is concluded that the biggest technological gap in port terminal automation is the ability for a system to react constructively to unknown and uncontrolled objects i.e., manually controlled equipment vs. automated equipment. On the side of regulatory challenges, the main conclusion is that the ownership structure of Danish ports politicizes some of the decisions of the management, which may hinder on efficiency for the sake of social sustainability. The lack of a clear incentive structure to develop port infrastructure is another regulatory challenge, as it introduces lack of foreseeability for terminal operators. This report generally concludes that there are gaps and challenges that cannot be addressed at the local level alone.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Technology gaps and regulatory challenges in Danish case studies: Deliverable D10.4'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this