Temporary use in England's core cities: Looking beyond the exceptional

Michael Martin, Stephen Hincks, Iain Deas

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper develops an understanding of the structural and spatial characteristics of regulated forms of temporary use across England’s core cities. The contribution of the paper lies in its adoption of an extensive research design that goes beyond the intensive qualitative approaches that predominate in the temporary use literature. We employ a novel dataset of 5890 temporary use interventions that have been recorded over a 15-year period (2000-15). Informed by the temporary use literature, we distinguish between ‘extraordinary’ (e.g. urban beaches) and ‘ordinary’ (e.g. car parks) forms of temporary use alongside other characteristics that include the time of occurrence; the function of space appropriated; decisions taken; and whether instances were isolated or reoccurring. Logistic regression is used to test whether the odds that a temporary use was defined as ‘ordinary’ or ‘extraordinary’ increased or decreased owing to their underlying structural characteristics. The analysis revealed that applications for extraordinary temporary uses increased in the period following the 2007/08 financial crisis but that ordinary forms of temporary uses remained much more common before and after the recession. It also revealed differences between ordinary and extraordinary uses in relation to the functions of the spaces appropriated and decisions taken by the planning authority in processing the application. Geospatial approaches were then applied to two case study cities – Bristol and Liverpool. The analysis revealed a tendency towards the clustering of temporary uses that was spatially and temporally uneven with extraordinary uses in particular concentrated in the cores/downtowns of the two cities.
Original languageEnglish
JournalUrban Studies
Pages (from-to)1-21
Number of pages22
ISSN0042-0980
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 2020

Fingerprint

city center
recession
financial crisis
research planning
logistics
regression
planning
beach
literature
city
decision
analysis
time
test
car park

Keywords

  • temporary urbanism
  • temporary use
  • regeneration
  • redevelopment
  • planning
  • method
  • land use
  • built environment

Cite this

@article{3152234e47ba4f1087f521f8d1337052,
title = "Temporary use in England's core cities: Looking beyond the exceptional",
abstract = "This paper develops an understanding of the structural and spatial characteristics of regulated forms of temporary use across England’s core cities. The contribution of the paper lies in its adoption of an extensive research design that goes beyond the intensive qualitative approaches that predominate in the temporary use literature. We employ a novel dataset of 5890 temporary use interventions that have been recorded over a 15-year period (2000-15). Informed by the temporary use literature, we distinguish between ‘extraordinary’ (e.g. urban beaches) and ‘ordinary’ (e.g. car parks) forms of temporary use alongside other characteristics that include the time of occurrence; the function of space appropriated; decisions taken; and whether instances were isolated or reoccurring. Logistic regression is used to test whether the odds that a temporary use was defined as ‘ordinary’ or ‘extraordinary’ increased or decreased owing to their underlying structural characteristics. The analysis revealed that applications for extraordinary temporary uses increased in the period following the 2007/08 financial crisis but that ordinary forms of temporary uses remained much more common before and after the recession. It also revealed differences between ordinary and extraordinary uses in relation to the functions of the spaces appropriated and decisions taken by the planning authority in processing the application. Geospatial approaches were then applied to two case study cities – Bristol and Liverpool. The analysis revealed a tendency towards the clustering of temporary uses that was spatially and temporally uneven with extraordinary uses in particular concentrated in the cores/downtowns of the two cities.",
keywords = "temporary urbanism, temporary use, regeneration, redevelopment, planning, method, land use, built environment",
author = "Michael Martin and Stephen Hincks and Iain Deas",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.1177/0042098019898076",
language = "English",
pages = "1--21",
journal = "Urban Studies",
issn = "0042-0980",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",

}

Temporary use in England's core cities: Looking beyond the exceptional. / Martin, Michael; Hincks, Stephen; Deas, Iain .

In: Urban Studies, 2020, p. 1-21.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Temporary use in England's core cities: Looking beyond the exceptional

AU - Martin, Michael

AU - Hincks, Stephen

AU - Deas, Iain

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - This paper develops an understanding of the structural and spatial characteristics of regulated forms of temporary use across England’s core cities. The contribution of the paper lies in its adoption of an extensive research design that goes beyond the intensive qualitative approaches that predominate in the temporary use literature. We employ a novel dataset of 5890 temporary use interventions that have been recorded over a 15-year period (2000-15). Informed by the temporary use literature, we distinguish between ‘extraordinary’ (e.g. urban beaches) and ‘ordinary’ (e.g. car parks) forms of temporary use alongside other characteristics that include the time of occurrence; the function of space appropriated; decisions taken; and whether instances were isolated or reoccurring. Logistic regression is used to test whether the odds that a temporary use was defined as ‘ordinary’ or ‘extraordinary’ increased or decreased owing to their underlying structural characteristics. The analysis revealed that applications for extraordinary temporary uses increased in the period following the 2007/08 financial crisis but that ordinary forms of temporary uses remained much more common before and after the recession. It also revealed differences between ordinary and extraordinary uses in relation to the functions of the spaces appropriated and decisions taken by the planning authority in processing the application. Geospatial approaches were then applied to two case study cities – Bristol and Liverpool. The analysis revealed a tendency towards the clustering of temporary uses that was spatially and temporally uneven with extraordinary uses in particular concentrated in the cores/downtowns of the two cities.

AB - This paper develops an understanding of the structural and spatial characteristics of regulated forms of temporary use across England’s core cities. The contribution of the paper lies in its adoption of an extensive research design that goes beyond the intensive qualitative approaches that predominate in the temporary use literature. We employ a novel dataset of 5890 temporary use interventions that have been recorded over a 15-year period (2000-15). Informed by the temporary use literature, we distinguish between ‘extraordinary’ (e.g. urban beaches) and ‘ordinary’ (e.g. car parks) forms of temporary use alongside other characteristics that include the time of occurrence; the function of space appropriated; decisions taken; and whether instances were isolated or reoccurring. Logistic regression is used to test whether the odds that a temporary use was defined as ‘ordinary’ or ‘extraordinary’ increased or decreased owing to their underlying structural characteristics. The analysis revealed that applications for extraordinary temporary uses increased in the period following the 2007/08 financial crisis but that ordinary forms of temporary uses remained much more common before and after the recession. It also revealed differences between ordinary and extraordinary uses in relation to the functions of the spaces appropriated and decisions taken by the planning authority in processing the application. Geospatial approaches were then applied to two case study cities – Bristol and Liverpool. The analysis revealed a tendency towards the clustering of temporary uses that was spatially and temporally uneven with extraordinary uses in particular concentrated in the cores/downtowns of the two cities.

KW - temporary urbanism

KW - temporary use

KW - regeneration

KW - redevelopment

KW - planning

KW - method

KW - land use

KW - built environment

U2 - 10.1177/0042098019898076

DO - 10.1177/0042098019898076

M3 - Journal article

SP - 1

EP - 21

JO - Urban Studies

JF - Urban Studies

SN - 0042-0980

ER -