Terminology used for renewable liquid and gaseous fuels based on the conversion of electricity: A review

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

As the transport sector transitions away from fossil fuels and renewable fuels shift into focus, it is important that the terminology around renewable fuels is clarified. A number of terms such as synthetic fuel and electrofuel are used to describe both renewable and alternative fuels. The aim of this article is to identify and review these terms to avoid any potential misuse. An integrative review of terminology has been made. This review did not differentiate the articles in terms of the methodologies applied, but had the main objective to identify the terminology used and its definition. The results confirm that the term synthetic fuel is used generically in the majority of articles, without providing information about the production process of the fuel or differentiating between fossil-based and renewable-based synthetic fuels. The majority of the articles use the term synthetic fuel to describe fuels produced with coal-, gas- and biomass-to-liquid (xTL) technologies. However, a number of articles use the term beyond this definition. Results for the term electrofuel gave a similar outcome, as it was not clear which processes were used for the fuel production. In some cases, both synthetic and electrofuel referred to fuels produced through the same process, even though in reality the two processes are distinctly different. This could lead to a misinterpretation, especially if the terminology is utilized by policymakers. To prevent this, the article ends with a preliminary proposal for how to differentiate synthetic fuels from electrofuels based on the production process.
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Cleaner Production
Volume112
Issue number5
Pages (from-to)3709-3720
Number of pages11
ISSN0959-6526
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 20 Jan 2016

Fingerprint

Synthetic fuels
Terminology
terminology
electricity
Electricity
liquid
Liquids
Coal gas
Alternative fuels
Fossil fuels
Biomass
alternative fuel
fossil fuel
fossil
coal

Cite this

@article{0973f20ca9c547e4831e1c524891a2af,
title = "Terminology used for renewable liquid and gaseous fuels based on the conversion of electricity: A review",
abstract = "As the transport sector transitions away from fossil fuels and renewable fuels shift into focus, it is important that the terminology around renewable fuels is clarified. A number of terms such as synthetic fuel and electrofuel are used to describe both renewable and alternative fuels. The aim of this article is to identify and review these terms to avoid any potential misuse. An integrative review of terminology has been made. This review did not differentiate the articles in terms of the methodologies applied, but had the main objective to identify the terminology used and its definition. The results confirm that the term synthetic fuel is used generically in the majority of articles, without providing information about the production process of the fuel or differentiating between fossil-based and renewable-based synthetic fuels. The majority of the articles use the term synthetic fuel to describe fuels produced with coal-, gas- and biomass-to-liquid (xTL) technologies. However, a number of articles use the term beyond this definition. Results for the term electrofuel gave a similar outcome, as it was not clear which processes were used for the fuel production. In some cases, both synthetic and electrofuel referred to fuels produced through the same process, even though in reality the two processes are distinctly different. This could lead to a misinterpretation, especially if the terminology is utilized by policymakers. To prevent this, the article ends with a preliminary proposal for how to differentiate synthetic fuels from electrofuels based on the production process.",
author = "Iva Ridjan and Mathiesen, {Brian Vad} and David Connolly",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.117",
language = "English",
volume = "112",
pages = "3709--3720",
journal = "Journal of Cleaner Production",
issn = "0959-6526",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "5",

}

Terminology used for renewable liquid and gaseous fuels based on the conversion of electricity : A review. / Ridjan, Iva; Mathiesen, Brian Vad; Connolly, David.

In: Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 112, No. 5, 20.01.2016, p. 3709-3720.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Terminology used for renewable liquid and gaseous fuels based on the conversion of electricity

T2 - A review

AU - Ridjan, Iva

AU - Mathiesen, Brian Vad

AU - Connolly, David

PY - 2016/1/20

Y1 - 2016/1/20

N2 - As the transport sector transitions away from fossil fuels and renewable fuels shift into focus, it is important that the terminology around renewable fuels is clarified. A number of terms such as synthetic fuel and electrofuel are used to describe both renewable and alternative fuels. The aim of this article is to identify and review these terms to avoid any potential misuse. An integrative review of terminology has been made. This review did not differentiate the articles in terms of the methodologies applied, but had the main objective to identify the terminology used and its definition. The results confirm that the term synthetic fuel is used generically in the majority of articles, without providing information about the production process of the fuel or differentiating between fossil-based and renewable-based synthetic fuels. The majority of the articles use the term synthetic fuel to describe fuels produced with coal-, gas- and biomass-to-liquid (xTL) technologies. However, a number of articles use the term beyond this definition. Results for the term electrofuel gave a similar outcome, as it was not clear which processes were used for the fuel production. In some cases, both synthetic and electrofuel referred to fuels produced through the same process, even though in reality the two processes are distinctly different. This could lead to a misinterpretation, especially if the terminology is utilized by policymakers. To prevent this, the article ends with a preliminary proposal for how to differentiate synthetic fuels from electrofuels based on the production process.

AB - As the transport sector transitions away from fossil fuels and renewable fuels shift into focus, it is important that the terminology around renewable fuels is clarified. A number of terms such as synthetic fuel and electrofuel are used to describe both renewable and alternative fuels. The aim of this article is to identify and review these terms to avoid any potential misuse. An integrative review of terminology has been made. This review did not differentiate the articles in terms of the methodologies applied, but had the main objective to identify the terminology used and its definition. The results confirm that the term synthetic fuel is used generically in the majority of articles, without providing information about the production process of the fuel or differentiating between fossil-based and renewable-based synthetic fuels. The majority of the articles use the term synthetic fuel to describe fuels produced with coal-, gas- and biomass-to-liquid (xTL) technologies. However, a number of articles use the term beyond this definition. Results for the term electrofuel gave a similar outcome, as it was not clear which processes were used for the fuel production. In some cases, both synthetic and electrofuel referred to fuels produced through the same process, even though in reality the two processes are distinctly different. This could lead to a misinterpretation, especially if the terminology is utilized by policymakers. To prevent this, the article ends with a preliminary proposal for how to differentiate synthetic fuels from electrofuels based on the production process.

U2 - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.117

DO - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.117

M3 - Journal article

VL - 112

SP - 3709

EP - 3720

JO - Journal of Cleaner Production

JF - Journal of Cleaner Production

SN - 0959-6526

IS - 5

ER -