The association between second trimester ultrasound fetal biometrics and gestational diabetes

Anna S. Andersen*, Sidsel Linneberg Rathcke, Trine Tang Christensen, Anne Sørensen*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
57 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is the most common metabolic complication of pregnancy. The incidence of GDM is increasing worldwide and 5-25% of pregnancies are diagnosed with GDM depending on screening strategies and diagnostic criteria. GDM may lead to obstetric complications and increases the risk of adult metabolic disease in the offspring. Timely identification of GDM allows for regulation of maternal glucose levels which may reduce the obstetric complications considerably. The aim of this study is to investigate the association between second trimester ultrasound biometrics and GDM.

STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study including 2697 singleton pregnancies attending second trimester ultrasound scan at 20 + 0 to 20 + 6 weeks' gestation and giving birth at Aalborg University Hospital in the year 2020. Ultrasound measurements included head circumference (HC), abdominal circumference (AC), femur length (FL) and estimated fetal weight (EFW) by Hadlock's formula. Women with pregestational diabetes were excluded. GDM screening was performed on indication using oral-glucose-tolerance-test (OGTT) including 75 g glucose and a 2-hour serum glucose value ≥ 9 mmol/L was considered diagnostic. The association between fetal biometrics and GDM was investigated by logistic regression.

RESULTS: A total of 174 (6.5 %) were diagnosed with GDM. The incidence of GDM in pregnancies with biometrics above the 90th centile was; FL: 10.5 %, HC: 8.8 %, AC: 7.6 %, EFW: 9.3 %. Fetal biometrics above the 90th centile was significantly associated with GDM; ORFL = 2.07, p = 0.001; ORHC = 1.89, p = 0.001; ORAC = 1.63, p = 0.033; OREFW = 1.64, p = 0.036. This association remained significant for HC and FL when adjusted for maternal obesity (Body Mass Index ≥ 27): ORHC(adj)=1.56, p = 0.019; ORFL(adj) = 1.57, p = 0.049.

CONCLUSION: At the second trimester scan, fetal biometrics above the 90th centile increase the risk of GDM. In pregnancies that are later diagnosed with GDM fetal growth is increased already at the second trimester scan. Such knowledge underlines the importance of early identification of GDM.

Original languageEnglish
JournalEuropean Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Volume276
Pages (from-to)139-143
Number of pages5
ISSN0301-2115
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2022

Bibliographical note

Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords

  • Fetal biometry
  • Fetal growth
  • Gestational diabetes mellitus
  • Second trimester
  • Ultrasound
  • Pregnancy Trimester, Second
  • Humans
  • Fetal Weight
  • Glucose
  • Gestational Age
  • Biometry
  • Pregnancy
  • Birth Weight
  • Ultrasonography, Prenatal
  • Adult
  • Female
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Diabetes, Gestational/diagnostic imaging

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The association between second trimester ultrasound fetal biometrics and gestational diabetes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this