The indirect global warming potential of methane oxidation in the IPCC's sixth assessment report

Ivan Muñoz, Jannick Schmidt, Bo Weidema*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Greenhouse-gas emission (GHG) metric values for methane in the sixth assessment report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) include the indirect effect associated to the oxidation of methane to CO 2. An analysis of the figures provided by the IPCC reveals they assume that in average 75% of methane is ultimately oxidized to CO 2, while the remaining 25% is converted to intermediate degradation products, most notably formaldehyde, which are removed from the atmosphere via wet and dry deposition and treated by the IPCC as a potential carbon sink in terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. In this short article, we present a critique of this assumption, based on existing knowledge about the environmental fate of methane’s degradation products. We conclude that any assumption other than full degradation of methane to CO 2 in a rather short time frame is questionable, whereby the default CO 2 yield from this oxidation, as far as GHG metrics are concerned, should be 100%. We re-calculate values for the global warming potential (GWP) metric in accordance with our findings, resulting in an increase in GWP100 from 29.8 and 27.0-30.40 and 27.65 kg CO 2-equivalents/kg fossil and biogenic methane, respectively. Although we only present the implications in terms of GWP, our proposal is conceptually valid for other GHG metrics as well.

Original languageEnglish
Article number121002
JournalEnvironmental Research Letters
Volume19
Issue number12
Number of pages5
ISSN1748-9326
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 22 Nov 2024

Keywords

  • formaldehyde
  • global warming potential
  • methane

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The indirect global warming potential of methane oxidation in the IPCC's sixth assessment report'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this