The interactive track at INEX 2005

Birger Larsen*, Saadia Malik, Anastasios Tombros

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to book/anthology/report/conference proceedingArticle in proceedingResearchpeer-review

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In its second year, the Interactive Track at INEX focused on addressing some fundamental issues of interactive XML retrieval: is element retrieval useful for searchers, what granularity of elements do searchers find more useful, what applications for element retrieval can be viable in interactive environments, etc.. In addition, the track also expanded by offering an alternative document collection, by including two additional tasks, and by attracting more participating groups: A total of 11 research groups and 119 test persons participated in the three different tasks that were included in the track. In this paper, we describe the main issues that the Interactive Track at INEX 2005 attempts to address and the methodology and tasks that were used in the track.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationAdvances in XML Information Retrieval and Evaluation - 4th International Workshop of the Initiative for the Evaluation of XML Retrieval, INEX 2005, Revised Selected Papers
Number of pages13
PublisherPhysica-Verlag
Publication date1 Jan 2006
Pages398-410
ISBN (Print)3540349626, 9783540349624
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2006
Event4th International Workshop of the Initiative for the Evaluation of XML Retrieval, INEX 2005 - Dagstuhl Castle, Germany
Duration: 28 Nov 200530 Nov 2005

Conference

Conference4th International Workshop of the Initiative for the Evaluation of XML Retrieval, INEX 2005
Country/TerritoryGermany
CityDagstuhl Castle
Period28/11/200530/11/2005
SeriesLecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)
Volume3977 LNCS
ISSN0302-9743

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The interactive track at INEX 2005'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this