The learning organization and organizational learning in the public sector: A review and research agenda

Amitabh Anand, Jacob Brix

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

17 Citations (Scopus)
1164 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to propose a new research agenda for the theories of “organizational learning” and the “learning organization” in relation to the public sector. The research agenda can be used by researchers to make explicit accounts of how and where the results from their studies advance the current state-of-the-art in the intersection between public sector and organizational learning and/or the learning organization. Design/methodology/approach: A combined systematic and bibliometric review methodology is applied based on the research that has been published in the past three decades. Findings: Through an analysis of 238 journal publications obtained from the Scopus database, the authors determine the leading authors, countries, highly cited papers and take the stock of current literature. Similarly, by analyzing papers published between 2010 and 2020, the authors identify current tendencies and emerging themes of organizational learning and learning organization in the public sector and offer avenues for future research. Originality/value: To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is potentially the first, fully refereed study published reporting on a bibliometric and a systematic review of organizational learning and learning organization in the public sector.

Original languageEnglish
JournalThe Learning Organization
Volume29
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)129-156
Number of pages28
ISSN0969-6474
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 26 May 2022

Keywords

  • organizational learning
  • the learning organization
  • bibliometric review
  • systematic review
  • literature review
  • public sector
  • co-production

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The learning organization and organizational learning in the public sector: A review and research agenda'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this