Abstract

Misperceptions about immigration and immigrants are widespread throughout the Western world. A common explanation for this prevalence, relying on motivated reasoning theory, stresses the role of predispositions—such as beliefs, attitudes, and biases—in shaping misperceptions. The aim of this article is to refine this predominant notion by using original survey data collected in Denmark (n = 2015), offering a more accurate and valid measurement of misperceptions. The results reveal a rather homogeneous pattern of misperceptions: negative misperceptions are prevalent not only among those with negative attitudes towards immigration but also among those with pro-immigration attitudes. Moreover, we find that self-reported knowledge has a limited influence on patterns of misperceptions. The article discusses the theoretical implications of these findings and outlines how future research can benefit from directing more attention to dynamics in party-political debates to capture both heterogeneous and homogeneous patterns of misperceptions.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere70010
JournalScandinavian Political Studies
Volume48
Issue number3
ISSN0080-6757
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 3 Jun 2025

Keywords

  • anchor points
  • immigrants
  • misperceptions
  • motivated reasoning

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The link between individual predispositions and misperceptions about immigrants: Insights from Denmark'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this