The politics of insufficiency: ambivalence and boundary work in the co-production of welfare services

Morten Frederiksen*, Ane Grubb

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)
68 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In the public and scientific discourse on welfare innovation and new public governance, community coproduction is thought to combine the best elements of the public and voluntary sectors, hence creating better and more efficient responses to social need. However, coproduction also blurs sectoral boundaries, potentially mixing incompatible practices, values and goals. In this paper, we investigate how volunteers and public sector employees experience and handle the coproduction ambivalence that results from cross-sector incompatibility. The paper is based on interviews and ethnographic fieldwork on welfare coproduction among managers, employees and volunteers in a large Danish municipality.

Original languageEnglish
JournalPublic Management Review
Volume25
Issue number3
Pages (from-to)501-521
Number of pages21
ISSN1471-9037
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Keywords

  • Community coproduction
  • coproduction ambivalence
  • new public governance
  • voluntary sector
  • welfare coproduction
  • welfare innovation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The politics of insufficiency: ambivalence and boundary work in the co-production of welfare services'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this