The post-normal politics and science of wind power planning: Evidence from a Danish near-shore wind farm tender

Katinka Johansen, Paul Upham

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)
128 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Post-normal science (PNS) has long advocated the inclusion of stakeholders in scientific processes where there is uncertainty, urgency and high stakes. Increasingly, however, such conditions have become recognised as the norm. Using the theoretical perspective of PNS, we examine the interactions between public objection, unstable coalition politics and uncertain environmental assessment knowledge to understand the case study of a Danish near-shore wind farm tender. In this case the original distinction made by PNS between facts, judgements, politics and science are confirmed as difficult to separate in what has been described as a condition of post-normal politics. The case, taking place within Denmark’s relatively transparent and inclusive wind power governance system, offers insights into the challenges of managing long-term environmental and energy policy objectives. However the case also demonstrates the challenges to the policy prescriptions of PNS, specifically regarding the notion of extended peer review communities (EPCs). Here we propose that the de facto condition for energy siting controversies is one of multiple, often self-organised EPCs.
Original languageEnglish
JournalEnergy Research & Social Science
Volume53
Issue numberJuly
Pages (from-to)182-193
Number of pages12
ISSN2214-6296
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • wind farm planning
  • post-normal science
  • EIAa
  • Offshore wind farms
  • local engagement
  • social acceptance
  • Environmental governance
  • Stakeholder engagement
  • Post normal science
  • Extended peer communities
  • Denmark
  • EIA
  • Wind power

Cite this