The Power of "Sultanism". Why Syria’s non-violent protests did not lead to a democratic transition

Søren Schmidt

    Research output: Contribution to book/anthology/report/conference proceedingBook chapterResearchpeer-review

    1 Citation (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The popular mobilization during the Arab Spring against the authoritarian political systems in the Middle East had very different results in different countries. While Tunisia today has democracy, the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt gained power by means of democratic elections and had that power for over a year until the old regime retook it. In Syria, however, civil war has been raging for over six years and has killed more than 300,000 people and made millions into refugees.

    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationThe Syrian Uprising : Domestic Origins and Early Trajectory
    EditorsRaymond Hinnebusch, Omar Imady
    Number of pages14
    PublisherRoutledge
    Publication date2 Feb 2018
    Pages30-43
    Chapter3
    ISBN (Print)9781138310544
    ISBN (Electronic)9781351387613
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2 Feb 2018
    SeriesRoutledge/St. Andrews Syrian Studies Series

    Keywords

    • Syria
    • Transition to democracy
    • Authoritarianism
    • sultanism

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The Power of "Sultanism". Why Syria’s non-violent protests did not lead to a democratic transition'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this