The role of thermography in assessment of wounds. A scoping review

Assessment of wounds based on visual appearance has poor inter- and intra-rater reliability and it is difficult to differentiate between inflammation and infection. Thermography is a user-friendly quantitative image technique that collects the skin surface temperature pattern of the wound area and immediately visualizes the temperatures as a rainbow coloured diagram. The aim of this scoping review is to map and summarize the existing evidence on how thermography has been used to assess signs of inflammation in humans and animals with surgical or traumatic wounds. The method follows the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology. The databases searched were PubMed, Embase, CINAHL and Cochrane Library. 3798 sources were identified, 2666 were screened on title and abstract, 99 on full text and 19 studies were included for review. We found that the literature is diverse and originates from a variety of scientific fields. Thermography has been used to detect and predict inflammation and infection in surgical wounds. Grading systems based on the visual appearance correlate to temperature patterns detected with thermography. The general tendency is that thermography detects the temperature in a wound with inflammation to be warmer than a reference area or the same skin area before surgery. In a surgical wound the temperature is elevated 1–2 weeks after surgery due to natural physiological inflammation that induces healing, after 2 weeks the temperature of the wound area slowly and steady decreases to baseline over 1–3 months. If a secondary temperature peak happens during the healing phase of a surgical wound, it is likely that infection has occurred. Modern handheld thermographic cameras might be a promising tool for the clinician to quickly quantify the temperature pattern of surgical wounds to distinguish between inflammation and infection. However, firm evidence supporting infection thermography surveillance of surgical wounds as a technique is missing.