The Yo-Yo intermittent recovery test level 1 as a high intensity training tool: Aerobic and anaerobic responses

Eamonn Delahunt*, Louise Callan, Jessica Donohoe, Ruth Melican, Sinéad Holden

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of using the Yo-Yo intermittent recovery test level 1 (Yo-Yo IR1) as a high intensity training tool for sedentary university female students. Methods: Baseline measures were recorded for body fat percentage, Wingate Anaerobic Test (WAnT) peak power and mean power, and Yo-Yo IR1 performance. Subjects were matched in pairs for body fat percentage and then randomly allocated to the intervention group (INT) (n. =. 12) or control group (CON) (n. =. 13). The INT undertook a 6-week training programme twice a week using the Yo-Yo IR1. The CON undertook no training. Results: The INT increased their Yo-Yo IR1 performance (230. ±. 38. m baseline vs 403. ±. 152. m post-training), WAnT peak power (970. ±. 176. Watts baseline vs 1148. ±. 159. Watts post-training), and WAnT mean power (399. ±. 55. Watts baseline vs 439. ±. 53. Watts post-training) (p. <. 0.05). No changes were observed in the CON (p. >. 0.05). Conclusion: The results of this study show that a 6-week high intensity intermittent training programme using the Yo-Yo IR1 as a training intervention increases both aerobic and anaerobic capacity in a sedentary female population.

Original languageEnglish
JournalPreventive Medicine
Volume56
Issue number5
Pages (from-to)278-282
Number of pages5
ISSN0091-7435
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2013
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Exercise
  • Female
  • Fitness
  • Health
  • Sedentary lifestyle

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Yo-Yo intermittent recovery test level 1 as a high intensity training tool: Aerobic and anaerobic responses'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this