Theory-Based Stakeholder Evaluation – applied. Competing Stakeholder Theories in the Quality Management of Primary Education

Morten Balle Hansen, J. B. Heilesen

    Research output: Contribution to conference without publisher/journalPaper without publisher/journalResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    In the broader context of evaluation design, this paper examines and compares pros and cons of a theory-based approach to evaluation (TBE) with the Theory-Based Stakeholder evaluation (TSE) model, introduced by Morten Balle Hansen and Evert Vedung (Hansen and Vedung 2010). While most approaches to TBE construct one unitary theory of the program (Coryn et al. 2011), the TSE-model emphasizes the importance of keeping theories of diverse stakeholders apart.
    This paper applies the TSE-model to an evaluation study conducted by the Danish Evaluation Institute (EVA) of the Danish system of quality reports, a municipal framework to monitor and evaluate the quality in compulsory education in Denmark (EVA 2011). The paper reanalyzes the qualitative and quantitative data of the evaluation study by applying the TSE-model. The purpose is to test and elaborate on the practical use of the TSE-model, as an alternative to traditional program theory evaluation.
    Original languageEnglish
    Publication date14 Jun 2012
    Publication statusPublished - 14 Jun 2012
    EventNordic Evaluation Conference 2012 - Aalborg, Denmark
    Duration: 13 Jun 201215 Jun 2012
    Conference number: 1
    http://www.nek.aau.dk/

    Conference

    ConferenceNordic Evaluation Conference 2012
    Number1
    Country/TerritoryDenmark
    CityAalborg
    Period13/06/201215/06/2012
    Internet address

    Keywords

    • Evaluation
    • Theorybased Stakeholder Evaluation (TSE) model
    • politics

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Theory-Based Stakeholder Evaluation – applied. Competing Stakeholder Theories in the Quality Management of Primary Education'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this