Thromboembolic events in younger women exposed to Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna COVID-19 vaccines

Maurizio Sessa*, Kristian Kragholm, Anders Hviid, Morten Andersen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalLetterpeer-review

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: Concerns about the increased risk of blood clots associated with the VAXZEVRIA (previously named Oxford-AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine) and Johnson & Johnson (Janssen) COVID-19 vaccines raises the question of the thrombotic safety of other COVID-19 vaccines such as Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna, especially in younger women, who at the early stage of the pandemic was a priority group for vaccination. Methods: Using the US-based Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) and the FDA Event Reporting System (FAERS), we retrieved cases of thrombosis following vaccinations or hormonal contraceptive use in women aged ≤ 50 years. We used the reporting odds ratio (ROR) as a disproportionality measure. Results: On 19 March 2021, out of 13.6 million women aged ≤ 50 exposed to at least one dose of Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna COVID-19 vaccines in the US, only 61 cases were reported with a total of 68 thromboembolic events (1 case per 222,951 vaccinated). None of the thromboembolic events included in our analysis were disproportionally reported for the two COVID-19 vaccines. Conclusion: Our results do support that, when compared to hormonal contraceptive use, the mRNA vaccines do not show disproportional reporting of thromboembolic events in younger women.

Original languageEnglish
JournalExpert Opinion on Drug Safety
Volume20
Issue number11
Pages (from-to)1451-1453
Number of pages3
ISSN1474-0338
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2021

Keywords

  • COVID-19
  • FAERS
  • VAERS
  • Vaccine
  • thrombosis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Thromboembolic events in younger women exposed to Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna COVID-19 vaccines'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this