Topical zoledronic acid decreases micromotion induced bone resorption in a sheep arthroplasty model

Thomas Jakobsen, Søren Kold, Juan Shiguetomi-Medina, Jorgen Baas, Kjeld Soballe, Ole Rahbek

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)
214 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Initial micromotion of a total hip replacement is associated with aseptic loosening. The use of bisphosphonates could be one way to reduce peri-implant bone resorption induced by micromotion. Bisphosphonates compounds are inhibitors of bone resorption. The aim of this study was to investigate whether local treatment with bisphosphonate would reduce bone resorption and fibrous tissue around an experimental implant subjected to micromotion.

METHODS: One micromotion implant were inserted into each medial femoral condyle in ten sheep. During each gait cycle the implant axially piston 0.5 mm. During surgery one of the femoral condyles were locally treated with 0.8 mg zoledronate. The other condyle served as control. Observation period was 12 weeks.

RESULTS: Histological evaluation showed a fibrous capsule around both the control and bisphosphonate implants. Histomorphometrical analysis showed that 97% of the surface on both control and bisphosphonate implants were covered by fibrous tissue. However, the bisphosphonate was able to preserve bone in a 1 mm zone around the implants.

CONCLUSION: This study indicates that local treatment with bisphosphonate cannot prevent the formation of a fibrous capsule around an implant subjected to micromotion, but bisphosphonate is able to reduce resorption of peri-prosthetic bone.

Original languageEnglish
Article number441
JournalB M C Musculoskeletal Disorders
Volume18
Issue number1
Number of pages7
ISSN1471-2474
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Keywords

  • Journal Article

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Topical zoledronic acid decreases micromotion induced bone resorption in a sheep arthroplasty model'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this