Validation of automated sepsis surveillance based on the Sepsis-3 clinical criteria against physician record review in a general hospital population: observational study using electronic health records data

John Karlsson Valik, Logan Ward, Hideyuki Tanushi, Kajsa Müllersdorf, Anders Ternhag, Ewa Aufwerber, Anna Färnert, Anders F Johansson, Mads Lause Mogensen, Brian Pickering, Hercules Dalianis, Aron Henriksson, Vitaly Herasevich, Pontus Nauclér

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

34 Citations (Scopus)
43 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Surveillance of sepsis incidence is important for directing resources and evaluating quality-of-care interventions. The aim was to develop and validate a fully-automated Sepsis-3 based surveillance system in non-intensive care wards using electronic health record (EHR) data, and demonstrate utility by determining the burden of hospital-onset sepsis and variations between wards. Methods: A rule-based algorithm was developed using EHR data from a cohort of all adult patients admitted at an academic centre between July 2012 and December 2013. Time in intensive care units was censored. To validate algorithm performance, a stratified random sample of 1000 hospital admissions (674 with and 326 without suspected infection) was classified according to the Sepsis-3 clinical criteria (suspected infection defined as having any culture taken and at least two doses of antimicrobials administered, and an increase in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score by >2 points) and the likelihood of infection by physician medical record review. Results: In total 82 653 hospital admissions were included. The Sepsis-3 clinical criteria determined by physician review were met in 343 of 1000 episodes. Among them, 313 (91%) had possible, probable or definite infection. Based on this reference, the algorithm achieved sensitivity 0.887 (95% CI: 0.799 to 0.964), specificity 0.985 (95% CI: 0.978 to 0.991), positive predictive value 0.881 (95% CI: 0.833 to 0.926) and negative predictive value 0.986 (95% CI: 0.973 to 0.996). When applied to the total cohort taking into account the sampling proportions of those with and without suspected infection, the algorithm identified 8599 (10.4%) sepsis episodes. The burden of hospital-onset sepsis (>48 hour after admission) and related in-hospital mortality varied between wards. Conclusions: A fully-automated Sepsis-3 based surveillance algorithm using EHR data performed well compared with physician medical record review in non-intensive care wards, and exposed variations in hospital-onset sepsis incidence between wards.

Original languageEnglish
Article number010123
JournalBMJ Quality and Safety
Volume29
Issue number9
Pages (from-to)735-745
Number of pages11
ISSN2044-5415
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2020

Keywords

  • adverse events, epidemiology and detection
  • continuous quality improvement
  • critical care
  • information technology
  • nosocomial infections

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Validation of automated sepsis surveillance based on the Sepsis-3 clinical criteria against physician record review in a general hospital population: observational study using electronic health records data'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this