Validity of Management Control Topoi? Towards Constructivist Pragmatism

Lennart Nørreklit, Hanne Sloth-Odgaard Nørreklit, Poul Israelsen

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    63 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    For decades, management accounting research paradigms have been in competition without reaching any apparent closure, and struggles to bridge the gap between knowledge and doing have not been successful either. This paper argues that this state of affairs is due to an insufficient understanding of reality, which is rooted in the management accounting paradigms. The paper establishes a concept of reality as an integrated set of conditions for actions and argues that, without such a concept, the issue of validity cannot be addressed: management accounting and control only provide valid results in practice if they incorporate the four aspects of the world of human life-facts, logic, values and communication. On the basis of these aspects, some predominant research paradigms are subsequently analysed and, using a case study, the paper shows how the four dimensions are integrated in the practice of a successful manager. Finally, the paper explains why the integration of the four aspects is always unique and company-specific, forming what is termed topoi.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalManagement Accounting Research
    Volume17
    Issue number1
    Pages (from-to)42-71
    Number of pages30
    ISSN1044-5005
    Publication statusPublished - 2006

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Validity of Management Control Topoi? Towards Constructivist Pragmatism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this