What Managers Say when They Talk about Gender and Careers

Lise-Lotte Holmgreen

Abstract

Like in many other European countries, the Danish financial sector is one in which the male occupation of managerial positions predominates, with women tending to occupy lower-ranking jobs. Social constructivist research has pointed out that this inequality is connected to the way men and women interact discursively (e.g. Sunderland 2004; Holmes 2006; Litosseliti 2006).

A recent study tested this claim against the analysis of metaphorical constructions of gender and career issues in a Danish bank, finding that when female and male managers are organised into single-sex groups, they tend to use metaphors that reflect dominant discourses on gender, resorting only briefly to constructing gendered subject positions (author 2009).

The paper takes its starting point in this study arguing that single-sex interview groups promote stereotypical gender constructions among female and male managers. However, if organised into e.g. mixed-sex groups, men and women are likely to construct their own and the opposite sex along lines that reflect more diversity and hence, tend to adopt metaphors that reflect a number of gendered subject positions.

To establish the validity of this claim, the paper will present the analysis of a number of mixed-sex focus group interviews conducted in a Danish bank in 2007. Taking a critical approach to metaphor, the discussion will include conceptual aspects of metaphor, but will also consider the influence of contextual aspects on the instantiation and meaning of gender metaphors (e.g. Cameron and Deignan 2006; Charteris-Black 2007).

References

Cameron, L. and Deignan, A. 2006. The emergence of metaphor in discourse. Applied Linguistics 27, 4: 671-690.

Charteris-Black, J. 2004. Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. London/New York: Palgrave.

Holmes, J. 2006. Gendered Talk at Work – Constructing Gender Identity through Workplace Discourse. Oxford: Blackwell.

Author 2009

Litosseliti, L. 2006. Gender and Language: Theory and Practice. London: Hodder Arnold.

Sunderland, J. 2004. Gendered Discourses. Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave.

Original language	English
Publication date	2010
Number of pages	1
Publication status	Published - 2010
Event	Sixth International Gender and Language Conference - Tokyo, Japan Duration: 18 Sept 2010 → 20 Sept 2010 Conference number: 6

Conference

Conference	Sixth International Gender and Language Conference
Number	6
Country/Territory	Japan
City	Tokyo
Period	18/09/2010 → 20/09/2010

Keywords

Gender
Discourse
Metaphor
Interviews

Access to Document

What managers sayAccepted author manuscript, 10.8 KB

AUB Link

Search for the material in Aalborg University Library's search engine

Cite this

@conference{7aa7e910283011df937b000ea68e967b,

title = "What Managers Say when They Talk about Gender and Careers",

abstract = "Like in many other European countries, the Danish financial sector is one in which the male occupation of managerial positions predominates, with women tending to occupy lower-ranking jobs. Social constructivist research has pointed out that this inequality is connected to the way men and women interact discursively (e.g. Sunderland 2004; Holmes 2006; Litosseliti 2006).A recent study tested this claim against the analysis of metaphorical constructions of gender and career issues in a Danish bank, finding that when female and male managers are organised into single-sex groups, they tend to use metaphors that reflect dominant discourses on gender, resorting only briefly to constructing gendered subject positions (author 2009).The paper takes its starting point in this study arguing that single-sex interview groups promote stereotypical gender constructions among female and male managers. However, if organised into e.g. mixed-sex groups, men and women are likely to construct their own and the opposite sex along lines that reflect more diversity and hence, tend to adopt metaphors that reflect a number of gendered subject positions. To establish the validity of this claim, the paper will present the analysis of a number of mixed-sex focus group interviews conducted in a Danish bank in 2007. Taking a critical approach to metaphor, the discussion will include conceptual aspects of metaphor, but will also consider the influence of contextual aspects on the instantiation and meaning of gender metaphors (e.g. Cameron and Deignan 2006; Charteris-Black 2007). References Cameron, L. and Deignan, A. 2006. The emergence of metaphor in discourse. Applied Linguistics 27, 4: 671-690. Charteris-Black, J. 2004. Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. London/New York: Palgrave. Holmes, J. 2006. Gendered Talk at Work – Constructing Gender Identity through Workplace Discourse. Oxford: Blackwell. Author 2009Litosseliti, L. 2006. Gender and Language: Theory and Practice. London: Hodder Arnold.Sunderland, J. 2004. Gendered Discourses. Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave. ",

keywords = "Gender, Discourse, Metaphor, Interviews",

author = "Lise-Lotte Holmgreen",

year = "2010",

language = "English",

note = "Sixth International Gender and Language Conference ; Conference date: 18-09-2010 Through 20-09-2010",

}

TY - ABST

T1 - What Managers Say when They Talk about Gender and Careers

AU - Holmgreen, Lise-Lotte

N1 - Conference code: 6

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Like in many other European countries, the Danish financial sector is one in which the male occupation of managerial positions predominates, with women tending to occupy lower-ranking jobs. Social constructivist research has pointed out that this inequality is connected to the way men and women interact discursively (e.g. Sunderland 2004; Holmes 2006; Litosseliti 2006).A recent study tested this claim against the analysis of metaphorical constructions of gender and career issues in a Danish bank, finding that when female and male managers are organised into single-sex groups, they tend to use metaphors that reflect dominant discourses on gender, resorting only briefly to constructing gendered subject positions (author 2009).The paper takes its starting point in this study arguing that single-sex interview groups promote stereotypical gender constructions among female and male managers. However, if organised into e.g. mixed-sex groups, men and women are likely to construct their own and the opposite sex along lines that reflect more diversity and hence, tend to adopt metaphors that reflect a number of gendered subject positions. To establish the validity of this claim, the paper will present the analysis of a number of mixed-sex focus group interviews conducted in a Danish bank in 2007. Taking a critical approach to metaphor, the discussion will include conceptual aspects of metaphor, but will also consider the influence of contextual aspects on the instantiation and meaning of gender metaphors (e.g. Cameron and Deignan 2006; Charteris-Black 2007). References Cameron, L. and Deignan, A. 2006. The emergence of metaphor in discourse. Applied Linguistics 27, 4: 671-690. Charteris-Black, J. 2004. Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. London/New York: Palgrave. Holmes, J. 2006. Gendered Talk at Work – Constructing Gender Identity through Workplace Discourse. Oxford: Blackwell. Author 2009Litosseliti, L. 2006. Gender and Language: Theory and Practice. London: Hodder Arnold.Sunderland, J. 2004. Gendered Discourses. Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave.

AB - Like in many other European countries, the Danish financial sector is one in which the male occupation of managerial positions predominates, with women tending to occupy lower-ranking jobs. Social constructivist research has pointed out that this inequality is connected to the way men and women interact discursively (e.g. Sunderland 2004; Holmes 2006; Litosseliti 2006).A recent study tested this claim against the analysis of metaphorical constructions of gender and career issues in a Danish bank, finding that when female and male managers are organised into single-sex groups, they tend to use metaphors that reflect dominant discourses on gender, resorting only briefly to constructing gendered subject positions (author 2009).The paper takes its starting point in this study arguing that single-sex interview groups promote stereotypical gender constructions among female and male managers. However, if organised into e.g. mixed-sex groups, men and women are likely to construct their own and the opposite sex along lines that reflect more diversity and hence, tend to adopt metaphors that reflect a number of gendered subject positions. To establish the validity of this claim, the paper will present the analysis of a number of mixed-sex focus group interviews conducted in a Danish bank in 2007. Taking a critical approach to metaphor, the discussion will include conceptual aspects of metaphor, but will also consider the influence of contextual aspects on the instantiation and meaning of gender metaphors (e.g. Cameron and Deignan 2006; Charteris-Black 2007). References Cameron, L. and Deignan, A. 2006. The emergence of metaphor in discourse. Applied Linguistics 27, 4: 671-690. Charteris-Black, J. 2004. Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. London/New York: Palgrave. Holmes, J. 2006. Gendered Talk at Work – Constructing Gender Identity through Workplace Discourse. Oxford: Blackwell. Author 2009Litosseliti, L. 2006. Gender and Language: Theory and Practice. London: Hodder Arnold.Sunderland, J. 2004. Gendered Discourses. Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave.

KW - Gender

KW - Discourse

KW - Metaphor

KW - Interviews

M3 - Conference abstract for conference

T2 - Sixth International Gender and Language Conference

Y2 - 18 September 2010 through 20 September 2010

ER -