When Matters are Too Important to be Left to Leaders and Better Left to Democratic control

Research output: Contribution to book/anthology/report/conference proceedingBook chapterResearchpeer-review

Abstract

In this chapter, we argue that it is possible to question the importance of leaders in the management and maintenance of organizations or specific aspects of organizational functioning by questioning the adequacy of leaders. Using the management and maintenance of the psycho-social work environment as an example, we point to a series of constraints which make it highly questionable to credit leaders with the will, abilities and possibilities that such a management and maintenance requires. We also argue that an exaggerated belief in leaders is particularly harmful in this context because it is a poor substitute for the management and maintenance of the psycho-social work environment offered by the active participation in a worker collective, the qualified backup (and control) of health and safety committee representatives and union membership
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationDebating Leaderless Management : Can Employees Do Without Managers?
Number of pages17
Volume1
Publication dateDec 2022
Edition1
Pages59-76
Chapter4
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2022

Cite this