Abstract

In this chapter, we argue that it is possible to question the importance of leaders in the management and maintenance of organizations or specific aspects of organizational functioning by questioning the adequacy of leaders. Using the management and maintenance of the psycho-social work environment as an example, we point to a series of constraints which make it highly questionable to credit leaders with the will, abilities and possibilities that such a management and maintenance requires. We also argue that an exaggerated belief in leaders is particularly harmful in this context because it is a poor substitute for the management and maintenance of the psycho-social work environment offered by the active participation in a worker collective, the qualified backup (and control) of health and safety committee representatives and union membership.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationDebating Leaderless Management : Can Employees Do Without Managers?
EditorsFrederik Hertel, Anders Örtenblad, Kenneth Mølberg Jørgensen
Number of pages17
Volume1
Publication dateJan 2023
Edition1
Pages59-76
Chapter4
ISBN (Print)978-3-031-04592-9, 978-3-031-04595-0
ISBN (Electronic)978-3-031-04593-6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2023
SeriesPalgrave Debates in Business and Management
ISSN2524-5082

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'When Matters are Too Important to be Left to Leaders and Better Left to Democratic control'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this