Which factors are associated with COVID-19 infection incidence in care services for older people in Nordic countries? A cross-sectional survey

Auvo Rauhala*, Lisbeth Fagerström, Andrej Christian Lindholst, Timo Sinervo, Tilde Marie Bertelsen, Trond Bliksvær, Bente Vibecke Lunde, Rolf Solli, Maria Wolmesjö, Morten Balle Hansen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)
58 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Aims: To investigate the differences between Sweden, Denmark, Finland and Norway regarding residential/home care units’ and frontline managers’ background factors, the resources allocated and measures taken during the initial phases of the COVID-19 pandemic, and whether and how these differences were associated with COVID-19 among older people in residential/home units. Methods: Register- and survey-based data. Responses from managers in municipal and private residential/home units. Number of municipal COVID-19 cases from national registries. Multilevel logistic multivariate regression analysis with presence of COVID-19 among older people in residential/home units as the outcome variable. Results: The proportions of residential/home units with client COVID-19 cases, mid-March–April 2020 were Denmark 22.7%, Finland 9.0%, Norway 9.7% and Sweden 38.8%, most cases found in clusters. The proportions were similar among employees. Client likelihood of having COVID-19 was six-fold higher if the employees had COVID-19. Mean client cases per residential/home unit were Denmark 0.78, Finland 0.46, Norway 0.22 and Sweden 1.23. For the same municipal infection incidence class, Sweden’s mean client infection levels were three-fold those of other countries. The regression analysis variables country, municipal COVID-19 incidence proportion, and care type were associated with client cases at p ⩽.001. Compared with Denmark, the odds ratios (ORs) for Sweden, Norway and Finland were 1.86, 0.41 and 0.35 respectively. The variable difficulties in preventive testing had an OR of 1.56, p ⩽.05. Conclusions: Municipal COVID-19 incidence, employee cases, and the lack of testing resources somewhat explained the confirmed COVID-19 cases among older people in residential/home units. A two- to five-fold unexplained inter-country difference in ORs in the multivariate analyses was notable. The level of protection of vulnerable older clients in municipal and private residential/home units differed between the included countries.

Original languageEnglish
JournalScandinavian Journal of Public Health
Volume50
Issue number6
Pages (from-to)787-794
Number of pages8
ISSN1403-4948
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2022

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright: © Author(s) 2022.

Keywords

  • COVID-19
  • COVID-19 testing
  • cross-sectional studies
  • Home Care Services
  • infection control
  • multilevel analysis
  • nursing homes
  • pandemics
  • primary prevention
  • Scandinavian and Nordic countries
  • Pandemics
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Humans
  • Norway/epidemiology
  • Incidence
  • Scandinavian and Nordic Countries/epidemiology
  • COVID-19/epidemiology
  • Aged
  • Sweden/epidemiology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Which factors are associated with COVID-19 infection incidence in care services for older people in Nordic countries? A cross-sectional survey'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this