Why a Single Measure of Photorealism Is Unrealistic

Simon Xavier Duran Højlind, Camilla Gisela Hansen Schnatterbeck, Jákup Klein, Lars Lund Østergaard, Roman Arberg, Stephanie Githa Nadarajah, Martin Weiss Hansen, Martin Kraus

Research output: Contribution to book/anthology/report/conference proceedingArticle in proceedingResearchpeer-review

474 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

While the concept of photorealism has important applications in computer graphics, the research community has not agreed on a definition of photorealism that specifies how to measure it. We employed two different test procedures, which correspond to different use scenarios, in order to determine the photorealism of a virtual reconstruction of a historic Viking building using two different lighting techniques. Even in this limited case, the measured degree of photorealism appears to depend on both the test procedure as well as the tested imagery; therefore, we conclude that there is no single measure of photorealism that is appropriate in all situations. Instead, photorealism appears to be a multifaceted phenomenon that requires different measurement procedures for different use scenarios.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the Spring Conference on Computer Graphics (SCCG 2014)
Number of pages4
PublisherComenius University, Bratislava
Publication date2014
Publication statusPublished - 2014
Event 31st Spring conference on Computer Graphics - Smolenice castle, Slovakia
Duration: 22 Apr 201424 Apr 2014

Conference

Conference 31st Spring conference on Computer Graphics
LocationSmolenice castle
Country/TerritorySlovakia
Period22/04/201424/04/2014
SeriesSpring conference on Computer graphics
ISSN1335-5694

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Why a Single Measure of Photorealism Is Unrealistic'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this