Young Caesar and the Termination of Civil War (31-27 BCE)

Research output: Contribution to book/anthology/report/conference proceedingArticle in proceedingResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The most likely legacy of civil war is renewed civil war; the Roman civil war(s) of the first century BCE furnish us with the best proof of this supposition. The task of breaking that cycle fell, finally, to Young Caesar – but how, in practical terms, did he bring this about? What ‘phase IV’ operations, activities conducted after combat in order to stabilise and reconstruct the area of operations, did Augustus facilitate? The ‘unconditional surrender’ effected by the suicide of Cleopatra and Antonius in 30 BCE was the obvious starting point to this phase; with Actium had come the decisive battle, followed by the triumph in 29 BCE, symbolising the end of war. This article examines different potential approaches to Roman history from Actium to the Settlement of 28–27 BCE, defining the period from 31 to 27 BCE as a process of normalisation in the wake of civil war. Its focus will be on ideological dimensions as well as practical political solutions: mainly the Settlement of 28–27 BCE and veteran colonisation. In so doing, this enquiry proposes to use modern theoretical approaches as well as historical studies in order to rethink the nature of civil war, and thereby enable us to ask more fundamental questions on the character of civil war in the ancient world.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationJacqueline & Inger Kuin (eds.) After the Crisis: Remembrance, Re-anchoring, and Recovery in the Ancient World
PublisherBloomsbury Academic
Publication dateJan 2020
Publication statusAccepted/In press - Jan 2020
EventAfter the Crisis: Remembrance, Re-anchoring, and Recovery in the Ancient World - Groningen University, Groningen, Netherlands
Duration: 15 Dec 201617 Dec 2016
http://www.afterthecrisis.nl/?page_id=476

Conference

ConferenceAfter the Crisis: Remembrance, Re-anchoring, and Recovery in the Ancient World
LocationGroningen University
CountryNetherlands
CityGroningen
Period15/12/201617/12/2016
Internet address

Fingerprint

Civil War
Fundamental
Colonization
Veterans
Unconditional
Normalization
Suicide
Surrender
Cleopatra
Supposition
Roman History

Cite this

Lange, C. H. (Accepted/In press). Young Caesar and the Termination of Civil War (31-27 BCE). In Jacqueline & Inger Kuin (eds.) After the Crisis: Remembrance, Re-anchoring, and Recovery in the Ancient World Bloomsbury Academic.
Lange, Carsten Hjort. / Young Caesar and the Termination of Civil War (31-27 BCE). Jacqueline & Inger Kuin (eds.) After the Crisis: Remembrance, Re-anchoring, and Recovery in the Ancient World. Bloomsbury Academic, 2020.
@inproceedings{db7241041ef04de5999e6ff6d541733f,
title = "Young Caesar and the Termination of Civil War (31-27 BCE)",
abstract = "The most likely legacy of civil war is renewed civil war; the Roman civil war(s) of the first century BCE furnish us with the best proof of this supposition. The task of breaking that cycle fell, finally, to Young Caesar – but how, in practical terms, did he bring this about? What ‘phase IV’ operations, activities conducted after combat in order to stabilise and reconstruct the area of operations, did Augustus facilitate? The ‘unconditional surrender’ effected by the suicide of Cleopatra and Antonius in 30 BCE was the obvious starting point to this phase; with Actium had come the decisive battle, followed by the triumph in 29 BCE, symbolising the end of war. This article examines different potential approaches to Roman history from Actium to the Settlement of 28–27 BCE, defining the period from 31 to 27 BCE as a process of normalisation in the wake of civil war. Its focus will be on ideological dimensions as well as practical political solutions: mainly the Settlement of 28–27 BCE and veteran colonisation. In so doing, this enquiry proposes to use modern theoretical approaches as well as historical studies in order to rethink the nature of civil war, and thereby enable us to ask more fundamental questions on the character of civil war in the ancient world.",
author = "Lange, {Carsten Hjort}",
year = "2020",
month = "1",
language = "English",
booktitle = "Jacqueline & Inger Kuin (eds.) After the Crisis: Remembrance, Re-anchoring, and Recovery in the Ancient World",
publisher = "Bloomsbury Academic",

}

Lange, CH 2020, Young Caesar and the Termination of Civil War (31-27 BCE). in Jacqueline & Inger Kuin (eds.) After the Crisis: Remembrance, Re-anchoring, and Recovery in the Ancient World. Bloomsbury Academic, Groningen, Netherlands, 15/12/2016.

Young Caesar and the Termination of Civil War (31-27 BCE). / Lange, Carsten Hjort.

Jacqueline & Inger Kuin (eds.) After the Crisis: Remembrance, Re-anchoring, and Recovery in the Ancient World. Bloomsbury Academic, 2020.

Research output: Contribution to book/anthology/report/conference proceedingArticle in proceedingResearchpeer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - Young Caesar and the Termination of Civil War (31-27 BCE)

AU - Lange, Carsten Hjort

PY - 2020/1

Y1 - 2020/1

N2 - The most likely legacy of civil war is renewed civil war; the Roman civil war(s) of the first century BCE furnish us with the best proof of this supposition. The task of breaking that cycle fell, finally, to Young Caesar – but how, in practical terms, did he bring this about? What ‘phase IV’ operations, activities conducted after combat in order to stabilise and reconstruct the area of operations, did Augustus facilitate? The ‘unconditional surrender’ effected by the suicide of Cleopatra and Antonius in 30 BCE was the obvious starting point to this phase; with Actium had come the decisive battle, followed by the triumph in 29 BCE, symbolising the end of war. This article examines different potential approaches to Roman history from Actium to the Settlement of 28–27 BCE, defining the period from 31 to 27 BCE as a process of normalisation in the wake of civil war. Its focus will be on ideological dimensions as well as practical political solutions: mainly the Settlement of 28–27 BCE and veteran colonisation. In so doing, this enquiry proposes to use modern theoretical approaches as well as historical studies in order to rethink the nature of civil war, and thereby enable us to ask more fundamental questions on the character of civil war in the ancient world.

AB - The most likely legacy of civil war is renewed civil war; the Roman civil war(s) of the first century BCE furnish us with the best proof of this supposition. The task of breaking that cycle fell, finally, to Young Caesar – but how, in practical terms, did he bring this about? What ‘phase IV’ operations, activities conducted after combat in order to stabilise and reconstruct the area of operations, did Augustus facilitate? The ‘unconditional surrender’ effected by the suicide of Cleopatra and Antonius in 30 BCE was the obvious starting point to this phase; with Actium had come the decisive battle, followed by the triumph in 29 BCE, symbolising the end of war. This article examines different potential approaches to Roman history from Actium to the Settlement of 28–27 BCE, defining the period from 31 to 27 BCE as a process of normalisation in the wake of civil war. Its focus will be on ideological dimensions as well as practical political solutions: mainly the Settlement of 28–27 BCE and veteran colonisation. In so doing, this enquiry proposes to use modern theoretical approaches as well as historical studies in order to rethink the nature of civil war, and thereby enable us to ask more fundamental questions on the character of civil war in the ancient world.

M3 - Article in proceeding

BT - Jacqueline & Inger Kuin (eds.) After the Crisis: Remembrance, Re-anchoring, and Recovery in the Ancient World

PB - Bloomsbury Academic

ER -

Lange CH. Young Caesar and the Termination of Civil War (31-27 BCE). In Jacqueline & Inger Kuin (eds.) After the Crisis: Remembrance, Re-anchoring, and Recovery in the Ancient World. Bloomsbury Academic. 2020