Maturity Models in the Age of Digital Diversity: Beyond the Layne & Lee Legacy

Kim Normann Andersen, Helle Zinner Henriksen, Rony Medaglia

    Research output: Contribution to book/anthology/report/conference proceedingBook chapterResearchpeer-review

    12 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This chapter proposes a reorientation of the e-government maturity models by focusing on the activities rather than on the formal organizational structures and have the citizens as the key stakeholder for future e-government investments. We draw upon a discussion on the limitations of the popular e-government maturity model by Layne and Lee [1] included in the proposal of the Public Sector Process Rebuilding (PPR) model [2, 3]. The adoption and adaptation of Web 2.0 platforms and location-based services, and the parallel extension of conventional technologies as SMS and web-based self-services, challenge the view that e-government is focused in a formal organizational span of control. We propose a refined operationalization of the PPR maturity model, arguing that the activities and individual workers within the public sector and the citizens using and co-producing the public services will be the vehicle of change.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationInnovation and the Public Sector
    Volume19 Public Administration in the Information Age: Revisited
    PublisherIOS Press
    Publication date2012
    Pages205-220
    ISBN (Print)978-1-61499-136-6
    ISBN (Electronic)978-1-61499-137-3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2012

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Maturity Models in the Age of Digital Diversity: Beyond the Layne & Lee Legacy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this