MetaProSIP: Automated inference of stable isotope incorporation rates in proteins for functional metaproteomics

Timo Sachsenberg, Florian-Alexander Herbst, Martin Taubert, René Kermer, Nico Jehmlich, Martin von Bergen, Jana Seifert, Oliver Kohlbacher

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

53 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We propose a joint experimental and theoretical approach to the automated reconstruction of elemental fluxes in microbial communities. While stable isotope probing of proteins (protein-SIP) has been successfully applied to study interactions and elemental carbon and nitrogen fluxes, the volume and complexity of mass spectrometric data in protein-SIP experiments poses new challenges for data analysis. Together with a flexible experimental setup, the novel bioinformatics tool MetaProSIP offers an automated high-throughput solution for a wide range of 13C or 15N protein-SIP experiments with special emphasis on the analysis of metaproteomic experiments where differential labeling of organisms can occur. The information calculated in MetaProSIP includes the determination of multiple relative isotopic abundances, the labeling ratio between old and new synthesized proteins and the shape of the isotopic distribution. These parameters define the metabolic capacities and dynamics within the investigated microbial culture. MetaProSIP features a high degree of reproducibility, reliability, and quality control reporting. Embedding into the OpenMS framework allows for flexible construction of custom-tailored workflows. Software and documentation are available under an open-source license at www.openms.de/MetaProSIP.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Proteome Research
Volume14
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)619-627
Number of pages9
ISSN1535-3893
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'MetaProSIP: Automated inference of stable isotope incorporation rates in proteins for functional metaproteomics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this