Comparison of three methods of microsatellite detection

M. Christensen, L. Sunde, L. Bolund, Torben F. Ørntoft*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Examination of microsatellites is frequent in the diagnosis of cancer. Microsatellites are repeat DNA sequences scattered throughout the human genome. These repeat regions are very frequent and highly polymorphic elements. In this study we focus on dinucleotide repeats. We compared three different methods for the detection of microsatellites: use of the ABI Prism 377 fluorescence sequencer, autoradiography and silver-stained gels. DNA was extracted from various clinical samples and amplified by different polymerase chain reaction (PCR) protocols. DNA from normal and tumor tissues was analysed using each method. The fluorescence method was more sensitive than the two other methods; however, this technology is very expensive. It seems possible, when examining microsatellites on a low budget, to avoid radioactivity by using silver-stained gels as an alternative. In conclusion, we observed identical results when comparing autoradiography with the fluorescence technique. However, we observed variability in the results when interpreting a single locus comparing silver staining with autoradiography and the fluorescence technique. Classification of the tumors based on several microsatellite loci was always identical.

Original languageEnglish
Book seriesScandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation
Volume59
Issue number3
Pages (from-to)167-177
Number of pages11
ISSN0036-5513
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1999
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • ABI Prism 377
  • Autoradiography
  • Silver staining

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of three methods of microsatellite detection'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this