Detecting quasi-equal clocks in timed automata

Marco Muñiz, Bernd Westphal, Andreas Podelski

Research output: Contribution to book/anthology/report/conference proceedingArticle in proceedingResearchpeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A recent optimizations technique for timed model checking starts with a given specification of quasi-equal clocks. In principle, the zone graph can used to detect which clocks are quasi-equal; the construction of the zone graph would, however, defeat its very purpose (which is the optimization of this construction). In this paper, we present an abstraction that is effective for the goal of the optimization based on quasi-equal clocks: it is coarse enough to yield a drastic reduction of the size of the zone graph. Still, it is precise enough to identify a large class of quasi-equal clocks. The abstraction is motivated by an intuition about the way quasi-equalities can be tracked. We have implemented the corresponding reasoning method in the Jahob framework using an SMT solver. Our experiments indicate that our intuition may lead to a useful abstraction.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationFormal Modeling and Analysis of Timed Systems - 11th International Conference, FORMATS 2013, Proceedings
Number of pages15
Publication date28 Aug 2013
Pages198-212
ISBN (Print)9783642402289
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 28 Aug 2013
Externally publishedYes
Event11th International Conference on Formal Modeling and Analysis of Timed Systems, FORMATS 2013 - Buenos Aires, Argentina
Duration: 29 Aug 201331 Aug 2013

Conference

Conference11th International Conference on Formal Modeling and Analysis of Timed Systems, FORMATS 2013
Country/TerritoryArgentina
CityBuenos Aires
Period29/08/201331/08/2013
SeriesLecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)
Volume8053 LNCS
ISSN0302-9743

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Detecting quasi-equal clocks in timed automata'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this