Introduction: Identifying hydatidiform moles (HMs) is crucial due to the risk of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia. When a HM is suspected on clinical findings, surgical termination is recommended. However, in a substantial fraction of the cases, the conceptus is actually a non-molar miscarriage. If distinction between molar and non-molar gestations could be obtained before termination, surgical intervention could be minimized. Methods: Circulating gestational trophoblasts (cGTs) were isolated from blood from 15 consecutive women suspected of molar pregnancies in gestational week 6–13. The trophoblasts were individually sorted using fluorescence activated cell sorting. STR analysis targeting 24 loci was performed on DNA isolated from maternal and paternal leukocytes, chorionic villi, cGTs, and cfDNA. Results: With a gestational age above 10 weeks, cGTs were isolated in 87% of the cases. Two androgenetic HMs, three triploid diandric HMs, and six conceptuses with diploid biparental genome were diagnosed using cGTs. The STR profiles in cGTs were identical to the profiles in DNA from chorionic villi. Eight of the 15 women suspected to have a HM prior to termination had a conceptus with a diploid biparental genome, and thus most likely a non-molar miscarriage. Discussion: Genetic analysis of cGTs is superior to identify HMs, compared to analysis of cfDNA, as it is not hampered by the presence of maternal DNA. cGTs provide information about the full genome in single cells, facilitating estimation of ploidy. This may be a step towards differentiating HMs from non-HMs before termination.
Bibliographical noteCopyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
- Abortion, Spontaneous
- Gestational Trophoblastic Disease
- Hydatidiform Mole/diagnosis
- Uterine Neoplasms/diagnosis
- Hydatidiform mole
- Circulating gestational trophoblasts
- Cell-based non-invasive prenatal testing
- Liquid biopsy
- Gestational trophoblastic disease