Learning from the social construction of environmental indicators: From the retrospective to the pro-active use of SCOT in technology development

Morten Elle, Sven Dammann, Justus Lentsch, Klaus Hansen

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    30 Citations (Scopus)
    1 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

     

    This article explores the challenges, advantages and limitations of the pro-active use of the social construction of technology (SCOT) to improve the methods applied in the development of technology for use by a broad range of actors. Our example is the development of environmental indicators for buildings (EIFOBs). We compare the pro-active use of SCOT with both the ‘traditional' use of SCOT and with the ‘traditional' way of developing EIFOBs. pro-actively applying SCOT in developing EIFOBs has the potential of bridging some of the communication gaps at the boundaries between the various professional groups in a multi-actor decision-making process. Using SCOT in a pro-active way means the research becomes action research and the researcher goes beyond the role of a mere observer and becomes an actor too. This means the researcher has to consider the criteria for valid action research when designing and carrying out the research.

     

    Original languageEnglish
    JournalBuilding and Environment
    Volume45
    Issue number1
    Pages (from-to)135-142
    Number of pages8
    ISSN0360-1323
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2010

    Keywords

    • environmental indicators
    • sustainable building
    • stakeholder involvement
    • indicator design
    • social construction of technology

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Learning from the social construction of environmental indicators: From the retrospective to the pro-active use of SCOT in technology development'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this