OCT or Angiography Guidance for PCI in Complex Bifurcation Lesions

Niels R. Holm*, Lene N. Andreasen, Omeed Neghabat, Peep Laanmets, Indulis Kumsars, Johan Bennett, Niels T. Olsen, Jacob Odenstedt, Pavel Hoffmann, Jo Dens, Saqib Chowdhary, Peter O'Kane, Søren-Haldur Bülow Rasmussen, Matthias Heigert, Ole Havndrup, Jan P. Van Kuijk, Simone Biscaglia, Lone J. H. Mogensen, Loghman Henareh, Francesco BurzottaChristian H. Eek, Darren Mylotte, Miquel S. Llinas, Lukasz Koltowski, Paul Knaapen, Slobodan Calic, Nils Witt, Irene Santos-Pardo, Stuart Watkins, Jacob Lønborg, Andreas T. Kristensen, Lisette O. Jensen, Fredrik Calais, James Cockburn, Andrew McNeice, Olli A. Kajander, Ton Heestermans, Stephan Kische, Ashkan Eftekhari, James C, Spratt, Evald H. Christiansen, OCTOBER Trial Group

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

39 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Abstract Background Imaging-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with better clinical outcomes than angiography-guided PCI. Whether routine optical coherence tomography (OCT) guidance in PCI of lesions involving coronary-artery branch points (bifurcations) improves clinical outcomes as compared with angiographic guidance is uncertain. Methods We conducted a multicenter, randomized, open-label trial at 38 centers in Europe. Patients with a clinical indication for PCI and a complex bifurcation lesion identified by means of coronary angiography were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to OCT-guided PCI or angiography-guided PCI. The primary end point was a composite of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as death from a cardiac cause, target-lesion myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target-lesion revascularization at a median follow-up of 2 years. Results We assigned 1201 patients to OCT-guided PCI (600 patients) or angiography-guided PCI (601 patients). A total of 111 patients (18.5%) in the OCT-guided PCI group and 116 (19.3%) in the angiography-guided PCI group had a bifurcation lesion involving the left main coronary artery. At 2 years, a primary end-point event had occurred in 59 patients (10.1%) in the OCT-guided PCI group and in 83 patients (14.1%) in the angiography-guided PCI group (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% confidence interval, 0.50 to 0.98; P=0.035). Procedure-related complications occurred in 41 patients (6.8%) in the OCT-guided PCI group and 34 patients (5.7%) in the angiography-guided PCI group. Conclusions Among patients with complex coronary-artery bifurcation lesions, OCT-guided PCI was associated with a lower incidence of MACE at 2 years than angiography-guided PCI. (Funded by Abbott Vascular and others; OCTOBER ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03171311.)

Original languageEnglish
JournalThe New England Journal of Medicine
Volume389
Issue number16
Pages (from-to)1477-1487
Number of pages11
ISSN0028-4793
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 19 Oct 2023

Bibliographical note

Copyright © 2023 Massachusetts Medical Society.

Keywords

  • Coronary Angiography
  • Coronary Angiography/adverse effects
  • Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging
  • Europe
  • Humans
  • Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects
  • Tomography, Optical Coherence/adverse effects
  • Tomography, Optical Coherence/methods
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Coronary Disease/Myocardial Infarction
  • Cardiology General
  • Cardiology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'OCT or Angiography Guidance for PCI in Complex Bifurcation Lesions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this