In vivo charge injection limits increased after 'unsafe' stimulation

Suzan Meijs, Søren Sørensen, Kristian Rechendorff, Nico Rijkhoff

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapport/konference proceedingKonferenceartikel i proceedingForskningpeer review

Abstract

The effect of unsafe stimulation on charge injection limits (Qinj) and pulsing capacitance (Cpulse) was investigated. Four stimulation protocols were applied: 20 mA – 200 and 400 Hz, 50 mA – 200 and 400 Hz. Increasing Qinj and Cpulse were observed for all stimulation protocols. Corrosion was not observed with any of the stimulation protocols and no tissue damage was observed for the 20 mA – 200 Hz stimulation group. This indicates that the ‘safe potential window’ may not be applicable in vivo, as no damage was done stimulating with 20 mA at 200 Hz, while damage was done using the same current at 400 Hz.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TitelProceedings of the 3rd International Congress on Neurotechnology, Electronics and Informatics, NEUROTECHNIX 2015, 16-17 November 2015, Lisbon, Portugal
ForlagSCITEPRESS Digital Library
Publikationsdato2015
Sider101-105
ISBN (Trykt)978-989-758-161-8
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2015
BegivenhedInternational Congress on Neurotechnology, Electronics and Informatics, NEUROTECHNIX - Lisbon, Portugal
Varighed: 16 nov. 201517 nov. 2015
Konferencens nummer: 3

Konference

KonferenceInternational Congress on Neurotechnology, Electronics and Informatics, NEUROTECHNIX
Nummer3
Land/OmrådePortugal
ByLisbon
Periode16/11/201517/11/2015

Fingeraftryk

Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'In vivo charge injection limits increased after 'unsafe' stimulation'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

Citationsformater