TY - JOUR
T1 - Smart communities - Design of integrated energy packages considering incentive integrated demand response and optimization of coupled electricity-gas-cooling-heat and hydrogen systems
AU - Shi, Mengshu
AU - Vasquez, Juan C.
AU - Guerrero, Josep M.
AU - Huang, Yuansheng
N1 - Funding Information:
This research is funded by the China Scholarship Council (No. CSC202206730086 ).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC
PY - 2023/9/19
Y1 - 2023/9/19
N2 - This study aims to design integrated energy service packages with incentive demand responses (DR) for smart community users. Furthermore, given the role of hydrogen energy in multi-energy coupling (hydrogen-electricity, hydrogen-heat, and hydrogen-gas), this study thoroughly explores the multiple roles of hydrogen in an integrated energy system (IES). The carbon cost is embedded in the objective of the two-layer optimization model. The overall benefits of the different technical routes of (1) no energy storage (2) lithium battery (LB) (3) hydrogen production (HP), storage (HS), and waste heat recovery (WHR) (4) HP, HS, fuel cell (FC) and WHR (5) LB, HP, HS and WHR are compared. The results show that route (4) has better environmental benefits, route (5) has the best energy benefits, and route (3) has the highest net profit. DR has economic-energy-environmental advantages.
AB - This study aims to design integrated energy service packages with incentive demand responses (DR) for smart community users. Furthermore, given the role of hydrogen energy in multi-energy coupling (hydrogen-electricity, hydrogen-heat, and hydrogen-gas), this study thoroughly explores the multiple roles of hydrogen in an integrated energy system (IES). The carbon cost is embedded in the objective of the two-layer optimization model. The overall benefits of the different technical routes of (1) no energy storage (2) lithium battery (LB) (3) hydrogen production (HP), storage (HS), and waste heat recovery (WHR) (4) HP, HS, fuel cell (FC) and WHR (5) LB, HP, HS and WHR are compared. The results show that route (4) has better environmental benefits, route (5) has the best energy benefits, and route (3) has the highest net profit. DR has economic-energy-environmental advantages.
KW - Carbon cost
KW - Hydrogen storage
KW - Incentive demand response
KW - Integrated energy systems
KW - Lithium batteries
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85159047868&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.04.272
DO - 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.04.272
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:85159047868
SN - 0360-3199
VL - 48
SP - 31063
EP - 31077
JO - International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
JF - International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
IS - 80
ER -